Viewing 15 posts - 256 through 270 (of 338 total)
So Mr Harder, you last tax return..
we have some questions for you....
Just kidding!
(we'll see you later)
--Shaun
April 1, 2008 at 7:19 am
dude you crack me up!
SQL2000/SQL2005(Mode 80) DBA - 'Hey my results don't fit any of the available answers, the question is wrong!':unsure:
'I want the points!':angry:
Final thought from me (oh...
April 1, 2008 at 7:16 am
This thread has kept me entertained;
http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/FindPost477574.aspx
What a wheeze! 😀
--Shaun
April 1, 2008 at 7:01 am
:crazy: Arrrgh! :crazy:
Thats it I'm not posting on this thread anymore!
Other than to say its been educational for me to see how many poor, naive, neophytes
have fallen for this question....
April 1, 2008 at 6:59 am
Terry,
Though you are correct in the statement that both are identical please see the post by wayne.mcdaniel this thread, page 6 I think.
(aliasing a different column to be the...
April 1, 2008 at 6:46 am
Where is the link to the ten commandments?
--Shaun
April 1, 2008 at 6:27 am
Ok thats the three rules of DBAs 🙂
What about the three rules of REBAR? :hehe:
April 1, 2008 at 6:19 am
Yes, for all SQL Server 6.5/7/2000/2005/2008 and any other relational/object database;-
If they do not return an error for this type of Select returning two identically named columns then they are...
April 1, 2008 at 5:58 am
'Twas a pleasure, mate!
(note to self must curb my caustic, mean, aggressive streak more). 😀
--Shaun
April 1, 2008 at 5:31 am
Your expectations are/were flawed/jaded by the slack implementation of SQL in SQL Server 2000 🙂
Your opinion is noted, but is incorrect. 😉
Correct SQL syntax behaviour is demonstrated by, dare I...
April 1, 2008 at 4:57 am
ayan_m:
Dude you need to chill.:)
The question of the day is merely a test of one's own knowledge and where it is found to be lacking one should profit from the...
April 1, 2008 at 4:10 am
People should read all the previous posts before commenting.
The last two guys obviously have learned nothing!:hehe:
SQL server 2000 is flawed and SQL server 2005 (mode 80) is flawed.
Mode 90...
April 1, 2008 at 4:00 am
Jeff are those the 'Three Rules'? 😀
akin to Asimov and Clarke
April 1, 2008 at 3:21 am
barb.w:
answer (a) is wrong not in the context of the SQL version you are running but in the syntax of the SQL used in SQL Server 2000 and 2005(mode 80).:)
The...
April 1, 2008 at 1:47 am
AF - I agree it was a poorly presented question. 🙁
(should have stated 2005/Mode 9 compatible).
But what a way to learn! 😉
You learn more from your defeats that from your...
March 31, 2008 at 10:00 am
Viewing 15 posts - 256 through 270 (of 338 total)