Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 256 through 270 (of 338 total)

  • RE: ORDER BY

    So Mr Harder, you last tax return..

    we have some questions for you....

    Just kidding!

    (we'll see you later)

    --Shaun

  • RE: ORDER BY

    dude you crack me up!

    SQL2000/SQL2005(Mode 80) DBA - 'Hey my results don't fit any of the available answers, the question is wrong!':unsure:

    'I want the points!':angry:

    Final thought from me (oh...

  • RE: Training Programmers: Accessing Base Tables or Stored Procs

    This thread has kept me entertained;

    http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/FindPost477574.aspx

    What a wheeze! 😀

    --Shaun

  • RE: ORDER BY

    :crazy: Arrrgh! :crazy:

    Thats it I'm not posting on this thread anymore!

    Other than to say its been educational for me to see how many poor, naive, neophytes

    have fallen for this question....

  • RE: ORDER BY

    Terry,

    Though you are correct in the statement that both are identical please see the post by wayne.mcdaniel this thread, page 6 I think.

    (aliasing a different column to be the...

  • RE: Training Programmers: Accessing Base Tables or Stored Procs

    Where is the link to the ten commandments?

    --Shaun

  • RE: Training Programmers: Accessing Base Tables or Stored Procs

    Ok thats the three rules of DBAs 🙂

    What about the three rules of REBAR? :hehe:

  • RE: ORDER BY

    Yes, for all SQL Server 6.5/7/2000/2005/2008 and any other relational/object database;-

    If they do not return an error for this type of Select returning two identically named columns then they are...

  • RE: ORDER BY

    'Twas a pleasure, mate!

    (note to self must curb my caustic, mean, aggressive streak more). 😀

    --Shaun

  • RE: ORDER BY

    Your expectations are/were flawed/jaded by the slack implementation of SQL in SQL Server 2000 🙂

    Your opinion is noted, but is incorrect. 😉

    Correct SQL syntax behaviour is demonstrated by, dare I...

  • RE: ORDER BY

    ayan_m:

    Dude you need to chill.:)

    The question of the day is merely a test of one's own knowledge and where it is found to be lacking one should profit from the...

  • RE: ORDER BY

    People should read all the previous posts before commenting.

    The last two guys obviously have learned nothing!:hehe:

    SQL server 2000 is flawed and SQL server 2005 (mode 80) is flawed.

    Mode 90...

  • RE: Training Programmers: Accessing Base Tables or Stored Procs

    Jeff are those the 'Three Rules'? 😀

    akin to Asimov and Clarke

  • RE: ORDER BY

    barb.w:

    answer (a) is wrong not in the context of the SQL version you are running but in the syntax of the SQL used in SQL Server 2000 and 2005(mode 80).:)

    The...

  • RE: ORDER BY

    AF - I agree it was a poorly presented question. 🙁

    (should have stated 2005/Mode 9 compatible).

    But what a way to learn! 😉

    You learn more from your defeats that from your...

Viewing 15 posts - 256 through 270 (of 338 total)