Viewing 15 posts - 301 through 315 (of 337 total)
Don't worry I found the solution on the great information super landfill (the real reason for global warming) the interweb.
One uses left/right values of a defined range for each node...
January 9, 2008 at 9:01 am
I see how it deals with finite known sets of data, but how does it cope with new records, positional changes and deletions?
Or is this too big a topic to...
January 9, 2008 at 8:14 am
January 9, 2008 at 7:49 am
Jeff do you have a link to Celko's "nested model"?
--Shaun
January 9, 2008 at 7:36 am
My view on is that McFarland has answered the initial question but it is only treating a symptom and is not the cure, it solves the poster's issue.:D
The question is...
January 9, 2008 at 1:51 am
I said I agree with you. 😀
Just doing my question everything/trust nothing routine. 😀
What is the purpose of the original request? How will the result be used?
p.s. original poster =...
January 7, 2008 at 10:02 am
antonio - though I do not disagree with you, I would still like to know the context of the question.
but i still think a parent child relationship would be better...
January 7, 2008 at 8:47 am
Brent McCracken
I do not see how your data structure is easily usable without jumping through hoops;
The only way to implement this with ease is with two columns - parent...
January 7, 2008 at 7:38 am
If you do as Gail suggests make StudentID/CourseID a compound key nulls would not be allowed anyway.:)
--Shaun
January 7, 2008 at 2:43 am
Why have only one column?
Why not one for parent and one for child?
Is your table structure immutable?
--Shaun
January 7, 2008 at 2:36 am
Erm..should you really allow nulls in your relationship tables?
I don't think so because for the relationship record to exist both of the entities in the relationship must exist.
e.g. StudentCourse(Instructor) both...
January 7, 2008 at 2:32 am
Hmm...do you have the mathematical proof that 0 raised to 0 is undefined?
What make is your calculator?
Whoops! We've hijacked a thread!:D
However my reasons for 0^0 = 1
http://mathforum.org/dr.math/faq/faq.0.to.0.power.html
Hey Terri...
January 3, 2008 at 8:33 am
0 to the power 0 is undefined - maybe in pure maths
But my good ol calculator says it is 1. 😀
--Shaun
January 3, 2008 at 7:44 am
In my experience its not the cutting of code that is the problem.
One should always build quality software.
Its the people, especially those in charge, and they are usually the bean...
January 3, 2008 at 1:59 am
Damn! I should proof read what I type
14 base 16 is 20 in base 10
Doh!
But hey 2 out of 3 = 66% must be worth a 2/2 Degree 😀
--Shaun
January 3, 2008 at 1:49 am
Viewing 15 posts - 301 through 315 (of 337 total)