Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 136 through 150 (of 338 total)

  • RE: SQL Brain

    We didn't have to recite it ever just had to know it instantly without singing "once one is one..." etc.

    20 Sums in 20 Seconds was the test - less than...

  • RE: SQL Brain

    Yeah and implement a couple of stored procs called blow_to_head and alchol_intoxication which use some sort of fuzzy logic and produce random loss of data and strange returns from select...

  • RE: Stored Procedures Reconsidered

    Burn Charles! Burn I say!

    Hell hath no fury like a topic flamed!

    😀

  • RE: Stored Procedures Reconsidered

    Bugger! 🙂 my Bad!

    It was the second page.

    Stewart Joslyn post of T-SQL.

    Darth Barry - I couldn't write code like that without help, blood sweat, tears(someone else's) and the required ritual...

  • RE: Stored Procedures Reconsidered

    Jack Corbett (7/30/2008)


    Michael Taylor (7/30/2008)


    I would tend to disagree with this editorial in almost every way. The only real argument I saw as viable was the point about creating...

  • RE: Stored Procedures Reconsidered

    scott.w.white (7/30/2008)


    ...

    One thing to consider as well is that sprocs are vendor specific and require rewrites if you move from your current database platform, while there may be less...

  • RE: Stored Procedures Reconsidered

    Wow! nice fast reply - I see it. 😉

    But is it what is required?

    Is it good enough to replace the C(R)UD stored procs for every table aproach?

    What are the...

  • RE: Stored Procedures Reconsidered

    does anyone have a T-SQL Stored proc that is generic and does CRUD operations. (not so much read but insert and update).

    i.e. supply a an operation param, a tableName param,...

  • RE: SQL Brain

    I don't keep contact details in my head,

    but I do have a 1 through 12 instant lookup multiplcation matrix.

    .i.e. give me any two integers 1 through 12 and I know...

  • RE: Stored Procedures Reconsidered

    Databases crunch numbers and do set based math like theres no tomorrow - no OOP language can perform as fast doing loops.

    Hell yes! Single source for integrity and rule enforcement...

  • RE: SQL Brain

    email 15 characters!

    name 50 characters!

    What planet are you from? planet n00b?

    I take it this is not a serious thread 😀

  • RE: Knock, Knock…Who's There?

    sing4you (7/25/2008)


    Hah! You have a point about Texans!

    BTW, love the screw/bolt joke.:P

    Glad someone understood it.

    Yeah, thought that one up Friday afternoon, kinda sounds more crude than I intended 😀

  • RE: Knock, Knock…Who's There?

    Shaun McGuile (7/25/2008)


    iffy joke time -

    What's the differnce between a screw and a bolt?

    --Shaun

    Gotta be the numbers of beers! :D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D

  • RE: Knock, Knock…Who's There?

    US Computers

    I was meaning IBM for giving us the mass produced cheap beige box PC, Mr Gates for conning them with DOS, and Apple for its gimicks.

    iffy joke time -

    What's...

  • RE: Many-to-Many relationships with foreign key constraints?

    thood (7/25/2008)


    OK, I'm really intimidated my what everyone else has written so far, but here goes anyway.

    If you're re-assessing the data structure then is this not, as Tomm Carr alludes...

Viewing 15 posts - 136 through 150 (of 338 total)