Viewing 15 posts - 3,856 through 3,870 (of 19,564 total)
I will go ahead and give you one possible solution that I have been holding back on because I feel it would be a huge resource hog with the number...
February 6, 2014 at 2:40 pm
Have you looked over the job owners, or server utilization at the time that some of these jobs fail to start.
And they definitely do not start, right?
February 6, 2014 at 2:36 pm
Does this affect all 40 jobs or just some of the jobs?
Have you noticed any messages in the server logs (not agent logs)?
February 6, 2014 at 2:06 pm
Is that on the 2000 or the 2008 instance that you see the null database name?
February 6, 2014 at 2:01 pm
VoldemarG (2/6/2014)
IT will take a while till we complete the...
February 6, 2014 at 1:58 pm
Well, if you could answer the last part of my previous post, then there may be other possibilities that would be acceptable and not take excessive resources.
February 6, 2014 at 11:13 am
Robert klimes (2/6/2014)
$ds = New-Object system.Data.DataSet
$ds = Get-WMIObject Win32_LogicalDisk -filter "DriveType=3" -computer (Get-Content c:\computers.txt) | Select SystemName,DeviceID,VolumeName,@{Name="size"; Expression={"{0:N1}" -f($_.size/1gb)}},@{Name="freespace";Expression={"{0:N1}" -f($_.freespace/1gb)}}
foreach ($d in $ds)
{
$systemname = $d.systemname
$deviceID = $d.DeviceID
$volumename...
February 6, 2014 at 11:10 am
Luis Cazares (2/6/2014)
I'm pleasantly surprised, too. I wonder if this would stop people from improving working solutions.
Possibly but I would wager that it won't.
February 6, 2014 at 10:43 am
Lowell (2/6/2014)
wah.... this is the first time i saw this new highlighting and "this worked for the OP";cute ehnacement!
Wow - ditto. Never seen that before and it is definitely...
February 6, 2014 at 10:24 am
Sean Lange (2/6/2014)
Given that amount of data and that performance is going to be painful here is one idea.
Do a select distinct into a new...
February 6, 2014 at 9:58 am
ben.brugman (2/6/2014)
SQLRNNR (2/6/2014)
You can try this code that may get some execution counts for the function you are investigating.
Thanks for the script, in the script I noticed a number of...
February 6, 2014 at 9:39 am
Thanks for the article.
I agree with Phil that the Title of the article seemed to be unclear in the intended topic.
I think the article would also benefit from better formatting....
February 6, 2014 at 8:48 am
Ed Wagner (2/6/2014)
BWFC (2/6/2014)
Sean Lange (2/6/2014)
Ed Wagner (2/6/2014)
SQLRNNR (2/6/2014)
BWFC (2/6/2014)
SQLRNNR (2/6/2014)
Kurt W. Zimmerman (2/6/2014)
BWFC (2/6/2014)
Ed Wagner (2/6/2014)
L' Eomot Inversé (2/6/2014)
BWFC (2/6/2014)
AnimatedCartoon
Bugs
Bunny
Fudd (Elmer J)
Wabbit
Won...wabbit, won wabbit, won, won, won 🙂
Kill the...
February 6, 2014 at 8:39 am
You can try this code that may get some execution counts for the function you are investigating.
/* set the code text to be searched on with the variable @CodeName
*/
DECLARE @CodeName...
February 6, 2014 at 8:36 am
BWFC (2/6/2014)
SQLRNNR (2/6/2014)
Kurt W. Zimmerman (2/6/2014)
BWFC (2/6/2014)
Ed Wagner (2/6/2014)
L' Eomot Inversé (2/6/2014)
BWFC (2/6/2014)
AnimatedCartoon
Bugs
Bunny
Fudd (Elmer J)
Wabbit
Won...wabbit, won wabbit, won, won, won 🙂
Kill the wabbit
February 6, 2014 at 8:01 am
Viewing 15 posts - 3,856 through 3,870 (of 19,564 total)