Viewing 15 posts - 17,686 through 17,700 (of 19,564 total)
I think this is a nice foundation script.
February 1, 2010 at 11:29 pm
lmu92 (2/1/2010)
The effect on a single company is minor, I think.
But it seems to be a trust/loyality issue between each of...
February 1, 2010 at 2:44 pm
Ray K (2/1/2010)
http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic854826-23-1.aspx#bm857301Have you folks seen the latest response to this?!?
I resisted the urge to reply. If you can't say anything nice . . .
hmmmph
February 1, 2010 at 11:23 am
Alvin Ramard (2/1/2010)
Alvin Ramard (2/1/2010)
GilaMonster (2/1/2010)
Alvin Ramard (2/1/2010)
... this month? I hope not. It's only the 1st!!! 😀I think we'll all assume you meant January.
It's february...
February 1, 2010 at 11:19 am
Alvin Ramard (2/1/2010)
GilaMonster (2/1/2010)
Alvin Ramard (2/1/2010)
... this month? I hope not. It's only the 1st!!! 😀I think we'll all assume you meant January.
It's february already? Oh.
Fixed.
Well,...
February 1, 2010 at 11:13 am
Do you have your initial insert script written?
February 1, 2010 at 10:55 am
This is where contracts come into play. You bird-dog the contractor and get them to document everything. In the meantime you are learning what they are doing.
January 31, 2010 at 9:30 pm
I would consider losing the subqueries in favor of an alternative method. The alternative method would depend on the performance gain from testing a few different methods.
Please provide the...
January 31, 2010 at 6:27 pm
I too would recommend the 64 bit upgrade. IN addition, I recommend moving the additional applications off the server onto a dedicated application server. You are likely running...
January 31, 2010 at 6:24 pm
I think it is an intriguing idea. I was just speaking with some EMC people about this sort of thing. In benchmarking their SSD / Flash drives they...
January 31, 2010 at 6:16 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 17,686 through 17,700 (of 19,564 total)