Viewing 15 posts - 1,516 through 1,530 (of 6,486 total)
RBarryYoung (2/13/2010)
Alvin Ramard (2/12/2010)
Paul White (2/12/2010)
Way too much detail Barry :sick: 😀... and no pictures, PLEASE!!
So video is OK? :-D:-P
Gives a whole new meaning to "deep dive"....
:-D:sick:
February 13, 2010 at 11:52 am
CirquedeSQLeil (2/9/2010)
J-F Bergeron (2/9/2010)
Lynn Pettis (2/9/2010)
I guess it's time for me to start a personal black-list
Ehh, I wish I would've seen that comment before I posted the solution,
Why be so...
February 13, 2010 at 11:39 am
Did you perhaps define your SQL columns to be CHAR instead of varchar? Char is a fixed length column, so it will pad out the column to the defined...
February 9, 2010 at 5:51 pm
Steve Jones - Editor (2/9/2010)
February 9, 2010 at 11:04 am
(This answer was removed after its future question was previously deleted).
February 8, 2010 at 7:40 pm
Jeff Moden (2/6/2010)
The Dixie Flatline (2/6/2010)
Can someone tell me if it makes a difference whether or not the new servers...
February 6, 2010 at 8:38 pm
lmu92 (2/4/2010)
DECLARE @orderby VARCHAR(30)
SET @orderby='MSDue'
SELECT *
FROM myTable
ORDER BY
CASE @orderby
WHEN 'Job' THEN Col1
WHEN 'Author' THEN Col2
...
February 4, 2010 at 5:40 pm
Since you cannot cast the entire CASE to a datetime, convert the date to a correctly sortable string, i.e.
CONVERT(varchar(30),cast(CASE Job.[MFG Date] WHEN '1753-01-01 00:00:00.000' Then '12-31-2049'
ELSE Job.[MS Due...
February 4, 2010 at 12:15 pm
GilaMonster (2/1/2010)
milzs (2/1/2010)
February 2, 2010 at 7:17 pm
sgmunson (2/1/2010)
I really thought I had it licked when I read your post. I added a ROW_NUMBER() function (alias RN) based on your post to the original selection...
February 2, 2010 at 11:05 am
The basic answer is that Raid 5 is slower, but has better recoverability. Raid-10 is a bit less good for recoverability, but is substantially faster to write to.
That said...
February 1, 2010 at 6:36 pm
I'm a little late to the party, but worrying about the phantom copy of the record in the DB when your using CLASSIC ASP to access the data is like...
February 1, 2010 at 6:29 pm
Lynn Pettis (2/1/2010)
Didn't think of this earlier, but you really shouldn't be using @@IDENTITY either. You should be using SCOPE_IDENTITY().
Agreed to avoiding @@identity- although if you are in 2005...
February 1, 2010 at 6:24 pm
I'm having a bit of a low-brainpower day, but I think you can achieve what you're looking for using ROW_NUMBER(). If you use whatever you were passing as the...
February 1, 2010 at 3:25 pm
If you went from a Raid 10 stripe-set to Raid 5, your perf will suffer. The more write intensive in fact the worse it will get.
February 1, 2010 at 3:03 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 1,516 through 1,530 (of 6,486 total)