Viewing 15 posts - 2,356 through 2,370 (of 5,356 total)
Did somebody write anything? ![]()
--
Frank Kalis
Microsoft SQL Server MVP
Webmaster: http://www.insidesql.org/blogs
My blog: http://www.insidesql.org/blogs/frankkalis/[/url]
March 2, 2004 at 6:41 am
Do you really think so? ![]()
Never happened before...
--
Frank Kalis
Microsoft SQL Server MVP
Webmaster: http://www.insidesql.org/blogs
My blog: http://www.insidesql.org/blogs/frankkalis/[/url]
March 2, 2004 at 5:59 am
Honestly, I think that not only a job is the most simple alternative, it should also be the most reliable one.
However, you might be able to develop a small...
--
Frank Kalis
Microsoft SQL Server MVP
Webmaster: http://www.insidesql.org/blogs
My blog: http://www.insidesql.org/blogs/frankkalis/[/url]
March 2, 2004 at 5:16 am
Why reinvent the wheel and not rely on a job?
--
Frank Kalis
Microsoft SQL Server MVP
Webmaster: http://www.insidesql.org/blogs
My blog: http://www.insidesql.org/blogs/frankkalis/[/url]
March 2, 2004 at 4:25 am
Please do not cross post in different categories. Let's keep the thread here
http://www.sqlservercentral.com/forums/shwmessage.aspx?forumid=8&messageid=103504
![]()
--
Frank Kalis
Microsoft SQL Server MVP
Webmaster: http://www.insidesql.org/blogs
My blog: http://www.insidesql.org/blogs/frankkalis/[/url]
March 2, 2004 at 4:07 am
Take a look at jobs -> How to create a job in BOL
![]()
--
Frank Kalis
Microsoft SQL Server MVP
Webmaster: http://www.insidesql.org/blogs
My blog: http://www.insidesql.org/blogs/frankkalis/[/url]
March 2, 2004 at 4:04 am
There is one more thing to consider.
The batch and the dynamic statement both run in different scopes. While the dynamic for example has access to tables created in the...
--
Frank Kalis
Microsoft SQL Server MVP
Webmaster: http://www.insidesql.org/blogs
My blog: http://www.insidesql.org/blogs/frankkalis/[/url]
March 2, 2004 at 3:32 am
Yes, basically like the ones that were used with the old forum software.
![]()
--
Frank Kalis
Microsoft SQL Server MVP
Webmaster: http://www.insidesql.org/blogs
My blog: http://www.insidesql.org/blogs/frankkalis/[/url]
March 2, 2004 at 3:25 am
Ok, all I wanted to say has already been said. Just one more thing:
PLEASE take more care of QOD!
--
Frank Kalis
Microsoft SQL Server MVP
Webmaster: http://www.insidesql.org/blogs
My blog: http://www.insidesql.org/blogs/frankkalis/[/url]
March 2, 2004 at 2:50 am
While I do not receive mail on my own replies, I agree that this thing should be reviewed. Maybe we could return to forum subscription? And put the text of...
--
Frank Kalis
Microsoft SQL Server MVP
Webmaster: http://www.insidesql.org/blogs
My blog: http://www.insidesql.org/blogs/frankkalis/[/url]
March 2, 2004 at 2:38 am
Now that you've mentioned Yukon and the implementation of the CLR, the only thing that comes to mind is:
Good bye to clean set-based approach, welcome row-by-row processing.
![]()
--
Frank Kalis
Microsoft SQL Server MVP
Webmaster: http://www.insidesql.org/blogs
My blog: http://www.insidesql.org/blogs/frankkalis/[/url]
March 2, 2004 at 1:49 am
Ok, that's maybe a valid point! I don't know of an easy way to get reg values with documented procs. Well, there might be a way with the sp_OA* procs, but...
--
Frank Kalis
Microsoft SQL Server MVP
Webmaster: http://www.insidesql.org/blogs
My blog: http://www.insidesql.org/blogs/frankkalis/[/url]
March 2, 2004 at 1:44 am
Hey Steve,
did you receive my mail from Friday I think? about the monthly contest? I mailed it to you Andy and Brian, and am not quite sure which mail address...
--
Frank Kalis
Microsoft SQL Server MVP
Webmaster: http://www.insidesql.org/blogs
My blog: http://www.insidesql.org/blogs/frankkalis/[/url]
March 1, 2004 at 1:29 pm
What do we learn from this? This site is best viewed with open eyes! Anywhere!
>Yeh. Now have available SQL2k on dual Xeon/4GB servers plus
>SAN in Active/Passive cluster. Still working...
--
Frank Kalis
Microsoft SQL Server MVP
Webmaster: http://www.insidesql.org/blogs
My blog: http://www.insidesql.org/blogs/frankkalis/[/url]
March 1, 2004 at 1:23 pm
What is actually the difference when storing 1 and 0 in a BIT or an INT column? Why would the software not recognize BIT, but INT?
Anyway, I'd second Steve, there...
--
Frank Kalis
Microsoft SQL Server MVP
Webmaster: http://www.insidesql.org/blogs
My blog: http://www.insidesql.org/blogs/frankkalis/[/url]
March 1, 2004 at 1:18 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 2,356 through 2,370 (of 5,356 total)