DBAs still know whats best for their DB, right?

  • Yep,

    They are an external (an theoretically neutral) department with no connection to the issues involved.  Effectively they are for external verification that you raised an issue and it wasn't dealt with.

    Theoretically your union could provide the same function but good union reps are hard to find, plus they tend to be antagonistic towards management.

    A good HR department is supposed to advise on personnel issue, rights/benefits etc.  They are not just for hiring, firing and looking pretty in the mean time, though they seem to manage the latter with ease.

  • Theory and practice sometimes differ

    >...looking pretty in the >mean time, though they seem to manage the latter with ease.

    3 out of 4 isn't bad at all, I'd say

    --
    Frank Kalis
    Microsoft SQL Server MVP
    Webmaster: http://www.insidesql.org/blogs
    My blog: http://www.insidesql.org/blogs/frankkalis/[/url]

  •  

    Maybe this article can help bolster your argument as well.

     

    http://www.databasejournal.com/features/mssql/print.php/3067071

     

    Good luck,

    Ross

     
     

  • Nah, getting seriuos again. We were lacking those lighter threads here lately

    Has anybody mentioned using SQL Server Best Practice Analyzer yet? It can be downloaded from MS.

    --
    Frank Kalis
    Microsoft SQL Server MVP
    Webmaster: http://www.insidesql.org/blogs
    My blog: http://www.insidesql.org/blogs/frankkalis/[/url]

  • Long way up in this thread I  mention it


    * Noel

  • Oops!

    ...but that analyzer is not bad at all. It doesn't hurt to reference it twice

    --
    Frank Kalis
    Microsoft SQL Server MVP
    Webmaster: http://www.insidesql.org/blogs
    My blog: http://www.insidesql.org/blogs/frankkalis/[/url]

  • Why do I think I know this Development Manger?  As for the responses to the thread uh...NICE ! (yea yea I have no meaning full comments) 

    Jim Babington

    Jbabington@hotmail.com

    Jbabington
    Jbabington@hotmail.com

  • I am not saying is bad, is that is tough to find in such a HUGE thread


    * Noel

  • Yes, this should quality for the longest in the last months.

    --
    Frank Kalis
    Microsoft SQL Server MVP
    Webmaster: http://www.insidesql.org/blogs
    My blog: http://www.insidesql.org/blogs/frankkalis/[/url]

  • I have got to say I am excited about the response from the community (dare I say My Community) we have gotten here.  I will continue to fight this fight I have my managers full support and his.  So when this is all done I will post some of the arguments presented. 

    One more thing, they have already started to mention Yukon and .NET v2, saying that these allow for native SQL objects to be written there, trust me I will look into this, but thought again I would throw this out there as this will definately be one of his(dev manager) arguments.

    Thanks all

    Rev

  • Another reason for the simple minded to implement whatever comes up   , same like buying a bigger box if the current one can nolonger cope with what's being run on it.

    But it's a ggrrreeaaatt tool

     

    Johan

    Learn to play, play to learn !

    Dont drive faster than your guardian angel can fly ...
    but keeping both feet on the ground wont get you anywhere :w00t:

    - How to post Performance Problems
    - How to post data/code to get the best help[/url]

    - How to prevent a sore throat after hours of presenting ppt

    press F1 for solution, press shift+F1 for urgent solution 😀

    Need a bit of Powershell? How about this

    Who am I ? Sometimes this is me but most of the time this is me

  • Perhaps someone has developed a list of pros and cons to make a case for either side of this "inline vs. proc" argument...weight could be added to each bullet point and tallied to see which side's argument holds more water.

    Just a thought...

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    If you don't stand for something, you'll fall for anything!

  • Now that you've mentioned Yukon and the implementation of the CLR, the only thing that comes to mind is:

    Good bye to clean set-based approach, welcome row-by-row processing.

     

    --
    Frank Kalis
    Microsoft SQL Server MVP
    Webmaster: http://www.insidesql.org/blogs
    My blog: http://www.insidesql.org/blogs/frankkalis/[/url]

Viewing 13 posts - 46 through 57 (of 57 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply