Viewing 15 posts - 106 through 120 (of 349 total)
A good book for someone starting out with T-SQL is Murach's SQL for SQL Server. It's written from the point of what a developer needs to know about T-SQL.
June 23, 2006 at 6:22 am
OMG, please don't judge all of Florida by Jacksonville. You gotta check out Tampa, Clearwater, Sarasota, etc...
May 26, 2006 at 5:13 am
If you're interested in purchasing a book...
Microsoft SQL Server 2000 Performance Optimization and Tuning Handbook by Ken England does a good job of explaining the estimated execution plans, showplan text,...
May 25, 2006 at 6:53 am
Check out Pivot and Cross-tab reports in Books Online.
May 18, 2006 at 6:57 am
I really like ER/Studia from Embarcadero. ERWin is the industry standard, but does some odd things when reverse engineering, etc.
May 18, 2006 at 6:53 am
Here's a decent article to start with understanding the architecture of Windows-SQL Server clustering:
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/sql/2000/maintain/failclus.mspx
There's plenty more docs and whitepapers on Microsoft's site.
May 18, 2006 at 6:52 am
I have a friend that wants to do this (install the trial and when he is happy, upgrade to the full SQL Server 2005 version).
Any idea if this is...
May 16, 2006 at 6:51 am
I believe you can also right-click on the table in question and do an All Tasks => Generate SQL Script. It will include an ON [filegroup]. Just in case there's...
May 12, 2006 at 6:29 am
It very much depends on how many indexes are on the taqble, whether they are compound (more than one column) or not, what column data-types are indexed, what your disk...
May 12, 2006 at 6:26 am
I'm thinking of doing the same thing. I have a question about your response, Yelena.
re. 1. What features do named instances not support? I can't think of anything from...
May 12, 2006 at 6:22 am
I think it is on a table or index basis:
DBCC DBREINDEX
( 'database.owner.table_name'
[ , index_name
[ , fillfactor ]
]
) [ WITH NO_INFOMSGS ]
You might find a script in the...
May 11, 2006 at 8:06 am
I'd go with 80, and maybe specify fill factors for specific indexes (heavily hit tables get a lower number, Read Only ones get 100, etc...) individually. YMMV...
May 10, 2006 at 7:52 am
Definitely an arguement for setting the server-wide fill factor setting. Unless you are running a read-only database, the default doesn't make a lot of sense.
May 9, 2006 at 10:04 am
I think the idea is that if the DBA went in and "unconfigure" the rules, it would be logged to a secutiry log and the DBA would be required to explain.
I'd...
May 9, 2006 at 9:53 am
Sorry, was remembering what I usually use for clustered indexes.
Here's a good explanation:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/createdb/cm_8_des_05_9ak5.asp
May 9, 2006 at 9:45 am
Viewing 15 posts - 106 through 120 (of 349 total)