why does this return different count

  • please help me on this one too,...

    query1 returns 1569803 rows

    query2 returns 1350056 rows

     

    why is this happening?? aren't these similar queries,... please help

    -- query 1

    select count(*)

    from  nameaddr_ac addr, recipients rec 

    left outer join RecipientDistType dist on

    rec.idaccount = dist.idaccount and 

    dist.cdedoctype='INV'

    where

    rec.idaccount = addr.id_account

    and rec.cdeRecipientType = 'Market'

    -- query2

    select count(*)

    from  nameaddr_ac addr, recipients rec 

    left outer join RecipientDistType dist on

    rec.idaccount = dist.idaccount

    where

    rec.idaccount = addr.id_account

    and rec.cdeRecipientType = 'Market'

    and (dist.cdedoctype='INV'  or dist.cdeDocType IS NULL)

     

    thanks,

    vidya

  • No they are not the same.

    The first one only returns rows where dist.cdedoctype equals 'INV'.

    The second one returns rows where dist.cdedoctype equals 'INV' OR has a NULL value.

    The first one won't count NULLs.

    -SQLBill

  • thanks for the quick reply

    but this is my question

    this is the query i have on my older version of SQL

    select count(*)

    from nameaddr_ac addr, recipients rec, RecipientDistType dist

    where

    rec.idaccount = addr.id_account

    and rec.idaccount*=dist.idaccount

    and rec.cdeRecipientType = 'Market'

    and dist.cdedoctype='INV'

    what should be the equivalent for this in the latest version of SQL ???

    thanks,

    vidya

     

  • I don't think mixing syntax is a good idea.

    Try to make it consistent:

    select count(*)

    from nameaddr_ac addr

    INNER JOIN recipients rec ON rec.idaccount = addr.id_account and rec.cdeRecipientType = 'Market'

    left outer join RecipientDistType dist on rec.idaccount = dist.idaccount and dist.cdedoctype='INV'

    _____________
    Code for TallyGenerator

Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply