Very bad performance on a good HP DL380 Gen9 Server

Question

Very bad performance on a good HP DL380 Gen9 Server

Viewing 4 posts - 16 through 18 (of 18 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply

Jeff Moden SSC Guru Points: 1003872 More actions · Answer 1

Dird (10/24/2016)
TheSQLGuru (10/6/2016)
I also note that 32GB on a server is just silly these days
??

He means that it's an insufficient amount of ram. They've got USB memory sticks larger than that now. Of course, "It Depends" but ram is relatively cheap now and you should probably go for the max amount of ram your machine can handle.

--Jeff Moden

RBAR is pronounced "ree-bar" and is a "Modenism" for Row-By-Agonizing-Row.
First step towards the paradigm shift of writing Set Based code:
________Stop thinking about what you want to do to a ROW... think, instead, of what you want to do to a COLUMN.

Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.

Helpful Links:
How to post code problems
How to Post Performance Problems
Create a Tally Function (fnTally)

lensmithjr Mr or Mrs. 500 Points: 583 More actions · Answer 2

I appreciate the opinion, but the machine has mostly been built to a spec my company uses, and proves quite sufficient for the workload we have on it. I had input in changing the RAID to RAID 10. RAID 5 proved to be the bottleneck, so we created a RAID 10 array, and now the machine is performing much better, as the ETL in question was quite write intensive.

PiMané SSChampion Points: 13965 More actions · Answer 3

lensmithjr (10/25/2016)
I appreciate the opinion, but the machine has mostly been built to a spec my company uses, and proves quite sufficient for the workload we have on it. I had input in changing the RAID to RAID 10. RAID 5 proved to be the bottleneck, so we created a RAID 10 array, and now the machine is performing much better, as the ETL in question was quite write intensive.

RAID5 for write intensive databases is a killer... Even RAID1 is better... apart from having to replace the disks right after they fail... There's no 3rd parity disk in RAID1 🙂

RAID10 is the best and it has the disks/space ratio RAID1 has... 4 disks = 2 disks in RAID10 and 2 disks = 1 disk in RAID1 (2:1 ratio on both)..

If you need to work better, try working less...

lensmithjr Mr or Mrs. 500 Points: 583 More actions · Answer 4

So I found out the not too hard way. I am recommending that DB servers are set up as RAID 10 from now on. Our sysadmin hadn't seen such a write intensive deployment, so not much experience with how to configure. Now we know!