January 24, 2011 at 9:22 pm
Comments posted to this topic are about the item sys.objects
M&M
January 25, 2011 at 1:03 am
:w00t:
January 25, 2011 at 2:53 am
Nice and easy, thanks.
Need an answer? No, you need a question
My blog at https://sqlkover.com.
MCSE Business Intelligence - Microsoft Data Platform MVP
January 25, 2011 at 3:02 am
An easy question and I cannot believe I missed it. I answered too quickly without thinking about the other possibilities.
January 25, 2011 at 3:11 am
Thanks for the easy point today.
January 25, 2011 at 7:13 am
Nice question. Obviously several people might learn something since "System base table" answer was almost as popular as the correct answer.
January 25, 2011 at 7:22 am
Nice and easy start for the day..
January 25, 2011 at 7:26 am
SanDroid (1/25/2011)
Nice question. Obviously several people might learn something since "System base table" answer was almost as popular as the correct answer.
Yup, that's the one I selected and as soon as I submitted my answer, I had a feeling it was going to be wrong.
January 25, 2011 at 7:54 am
cengland0 (1/25/2011)
SanDroid (1/25/2011)
Nice question. Obviously several people might learn something since "System base table" answer was almost as popular as the correct answer.Yup, that's the one I selected and as soon as I submitted my answer, I had a feeling it was going to be wrong.
Here is a quick of the history of sysobjects or sys.objects on the differant server versions.
SQL 2000 - dbo.sysobjects was a System table. Contains one row for each object (constraint, default, log, rule, stored procedure, and so on) created within a database. In tempdb only, this table includes a row for each temporary object. Some did call it the base system table since it was the first object listed.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa260447(SQL.80).aspx
SQL 2005 - sys.objects system view was created as part of the object catalog. dbo.sysobjects and sys.sysobjects are made as compatibility views. M$ recomends switching over from one to the other.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms177596(v=SQL.90).aspx
SQL 2008 - Nothing changes but the server version.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms177596(v=SQL.105).aspx
It is important to mention that not only do sysobjects and sys.objects have a differant name, they have a differant schema also. The column names are differant, along with some other things.
January 25, 2011 at 8:41 am
Thank you
M&M
January 25, 2011 at 9:56 am
Thanks for the question.
Jason...AKA CirqueDeSQLeil
_______________________________________________
I have given a name to my pain...MCM SQL Server, MVP
SQL RNNR
Posting Performance Based Questions - Gail Shaw[/url]
Learn Extended Events
January 25, 2011 at 10:02 am
Thanks for an easy start to the day!
January 25, 2011 at 10:52 am
I found SanDroid's history lesson very helpful. Thanks for adding it to the discussion.
January 26, 2011 at 2:17 pm
Nice easy question.
But why have more than half the people who answered got it wrong? It is a straightforwards and easy one, isn't it? There's not something weird that's leading half the people to give wrong answers?
Tom
February 1, 2011 at 3:49 am
Nice & Easy
Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 15 total)
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply
This website stores cookies on your computer.
These cookies are used to improve your website experience and provide more personalized services to you, both on this website and through other media.
To find out more about the cookies we use, see our Privacy Policy