September 21, 2016 at 8:31 am
Thanks for the question, Igor!
I learned something.
- webrunner
-------------------
A SQL query walks into a bar and sees two tables. He walks up to them and asks, "Can I join you?"
Ref.: http://tkyte.blogspot.com/2009/02/sql-joke.html
September 21, 2016 at 8:37 am
Hi Igor,
thx for the interesting question. Do you have any thoughts on how hyperthreading relates to licensing?
Regards
Thierry
September 21, 2016 at 8:52 am
thierry.vandurme (9/21/2016)
Hi Igor,thx for the interesting question. Do you have any thoughts on how hyperthreading relates to licensing?
Regards
Thierry
Hi,
Hyper-threading has nothing in relation with the licensing. You're paying per core always.
Hyper-threading doubles the logical processors on your server, which for some environments could bring better performance.
Igor Micev
September 22, 2016 at 1:23 am
So what's the right answer? According to today's mail, is 16 logical processors. I'm confused now.
September 22, 2016 at 1:38 am
Mauricio_ (9/22/2016)
So what's the right answer? According to today's mail, is 16 logical processors. I'm confused now.
The correct answer is 24 logical processors. Sorry for the mistake.
Igor Micev
September 22, 2016 at 1:50 am
Thx!
September 22, 2016 at 1:58 am
I have certainly learnt something today. I don't know much about processors on different editions and don't even mention licencing. These are the areas where I am not jealous of you DBAs.
Gaz
-- Stop your grinnin' and drop your linen...they're everywhere!!!
September 22, 2016 at 2:15 am
Thanks Igor.
September 22, 2016 at 5:47 am
If the correct answer is 24 logical processors, the newsletter is incorrect.
September 22, 2016 at 5:52 am
Toni-256719 (9/22/2016)
If the correct answer is 24 logical processors, the newsletter is incorrect.
Imagine that, you'd think they'd have corrected the e-mail they'd already sent out when they corrected the question on the website, wouldn't you? :rolleyes:
September 22, 2016 at 6:01 am
paul.knibbs (9/22/2016)
Toni-256719 (9/22/2016)
If the correct answer is 24 logical processors, the newsletter is incorrect.Imagine that, you'd think they'd have corrected the e-mail they'd already sent out when they corrected the question on the website, wouldn't you? :rolleyes:
Wow, awfully early to be that snarky.
Thank you for pointing out that the question had been corrected rather recently. I didn't realize that.
September 22, 2016 at 6:44 am
Oh well...
September 22, 2016 at 9:36 am
I got it wrong, so I got a bit surprised when the mail said that I was actually right... That's life. 🙂
Thanks, Igor!
September 22, 2016 at 10:12 am
Interesting question.
There is a rather odd statement in the explanation: "Hyperthreading does not affect licensing limits". That's not correct. Hyperthreading doess affect licensing limits on a virtual machine, if this question had been about running on a VM instead of directly on a physical machine the limit would have been reduced from 24 logical processors (12 cores) to 16 logical processors (8 cores) since the question states that hyperthreading is switched on: so having hyperthreading would reduce the licensing limit.
Tom
September 22, 2016 at 10:18 am
TomThomson (9/22/2016)
Interesting question.There is a rather odd statement in the explanation: "Hyperthreading does not affect licensing limits". That's not correct. Hyperthreading doess affect licensing limits on a virtual machine, if this question had been about running on a VM instead of directly on a physical machine the limit would have been reduced from 24 logical processors (12 cores) to 16 logical processors (8 cores) since the question states that hyperthreading is switched on: so having hyperthreading would reduce the licensing limit.
Tom...you're melting my head!!! :crying:
But I am sure that some will find that very interesting and informative. So thanks.
Gaz
-- Stop your grinnin' and drop your linen...they're everywhere!!!
Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 36 total)
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply