November 22, 2024 at 12:00 am
Comments posted to this topic are about the item Announcing SQL Server 2025
December 21, 2024 at 3:44 pm
Does it support .Net 5+ in CLR? It's kind of annoying having to restrict myself to .Net 4.8 for large projects sharing code with CLR backend stuff...
December 23, 2024 at 7:30 pm
No idea. Details are few and far between, but I'd think they'd rev the .NET support
December 24, 2024 at 4:17 am
Yeah. Back when it was SQL Server 2019, they posted this, which sucks.
I'm hoping this isn't their ultimate solution. I know .Net 5+ (so-called "Core") is an entirely different set of DLLs, i.e. a discrete language environment which has nothing to do with the "original" versions... I kind of think they've forgotten about CLR and are hyping Azure instead.
March 1, 2025 at 2:01 am
I just want them to fix the serious performance problems that started in 2019 and they've done (apparently) nothing to fix even up 'til today for SQL Server 2022. 🙁
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 1, 2025 at 3:52 pm
I just want them to fix the serious performance problems that started in 2019 and they've done (apparently) nothing to fix even up 'til today for SQL Server 2022. 🙁
I would not hold you breath as:
March 17, 2025 at 8:13 am
An interesting article:
What the Decline of Sql Server Quality means for Developers and DBAs
March 17, 2025 at 2:32 pm
"this is not enough of an annoyance for most people to seriously start looking at something like PostgreSQL"
Most? Probably still true. But they might want to re-evaluate their over-confidence and disdain for users.
March 18, 2025 at 9:48 pm
"this is not enough of an annoyance for most people to seriously start looking at something like PostgreSQL"
Most? Probably still true. But they might want to re-evaluate their over-confidence and disdain for users.
- Postgres growth numbers are incredible.
- We're seeing more and more well-known MSSQL leaders embracing postgres.
- Open source growth in general, and movement to the cloud, are are increasingly pulling businesses away from the Microsoft stack.
Some good points but maybe Microsoft are being visionary. I find what they are attempting to do with Fabric to be a bit mind blowing and do not really understand it. The idea of automatically replicating SQL data into OneLake certainly piques my interest.
At the moment I suspect the best SQL database for large numbers of users with high transaction rates is still Oracle but you really, really pay for the privilege. I think SQL Server is still the best mid-range option with plenty of support. Moving to Postgres has a learning curve and if just considering SQL might be a good option. It could be better to look at something like Fabric which may be easier to integrate into AI etc. No doubt time will tell.
March 18, 2025 at 10:52 pm
This was removed by the editor as SPAM
Viewing 10 posts - 1 through 9 (of 9 total)
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply