Getting ready for the third “Industrial Revolution”: Database 2010-2015
I searched the internet for “connect and forget”. Wonderbox.net offer is described as a...
2010-10-10
101 reads
I searched the internet for “connect and forget”. Wonderbox.net offer is described as a...
2010-10-10
101 reads
10 years ago IT professionals considered database technology “mature” and analysts were preparing to...
2010-09-13
69 reads
“The information age is an idea that the current era will be characterized by the ability of...
2010-08-22
68 reads
“Content is king” is the golden rule of the SEO. The semantic web is all about data. Any web...
2010-06-25
73 reads
Microsoft is associated almost exclusively with Windows and Office. Unfortunately a lot more...
2010-05-15
73 reads
I just finished reading “The next wave of technologies” by Phil Simon. A great read! It proposes a...
2010-04-18
61 reads
The 2008 trending topic everyone was talking about was the Web 2.0. On October 23 that same year,...
2010-04-02
85 reads
2001-01-01
100 reads
This month’s blogging party is hosted by Jeff Ianucci – his challenge is to...
As for me, I'll keep writing whenever time permits. I don't expect every post...
By Steve Jones
This is an interesting invitation this month. Jeff Ianucci is a new host, and...
Comments posted to this topic are about the item Pay for Performance, which is...
Comments posted to this topic are about the item Switching Schemas I
Comments posted to this topic are about the item Enforcing Unique Customer Emails When...
I run this query:
SELECT s.name AS schemaname , o.name AS objectname FROM sys.objects o INNER JOIN sys.schemas s ON s.schema_id = o.schema_id WHERE o.name = 'Beer'I get one row back for an object named dbo.beer. There is an ETL schema and both of these are nonpartitioned tables. I run this code:
ALTER TABLE dbo.beer switch TO etl.beerWhat happens? See possible answers