Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 113 total)

  • RE: Functions as predicates and SARGable queries

    rishi-445055 (8/25/2014)


    Hi,

    So if we make Code Nullable should not the query become non-sargeable, thereby meaning it does not use the Index ix_CCode, but making the column as Null still uses...

  • RE: Why Primary Keys can be important on large tables

    sql-lover (7/5/2014)

    I won't waste my time arguing with you. Your statements clearly shows you have zero working experience.[/QUOTE]

    OK - you got me πŸ™‚

    sql-lover (7/5/2014)Moreover, based on your posts on this...

  • RE: Why Primary Keys can be important on large tables

    sql-lover (7/1/2014)


    utterly rubbish!

    There is no difference between Unique Index and Unique Constraint, besides the obvious syntax of course.[/QUOTE]

    I don't know your knowledge but such an ignorance of ANSI defintions is...

  • RE: Why Primary Keys can be important on large tables

    sql-lover (6/30/2014)


    We can't tell you, as only you know how your Index, table and data are being accessed. Plus we don't even know your table's schema.

    The main advantage of having...

  • RE: Why Primary Keys can be important on large tables

    dhaneenja-755935 (7/1/2014)


    Hi Ben Kubicek,

    It's good Article. I have small Q. if...

  • RE: Why Primary Keys can be important on large tables

    Joe Fuller (6/30/2014)


    We changed the index to non-clustered unique and saved ourselves ~220GB.

    What are the performance problems we may face with this approach?

    Hi Joe,

    you compare apples with bananas πŸ™‚

    In the...

  • RE: Why Primary Keys can be important on large tables

    sql-lover (6/30/2014)


    I would personally stay away of GUI when creating PKs. This is not only because additional locks that the GUI will create, ...

    There will be no additional locks when...

  • RE: Why Primary Keys can be important on large tables

    This article is one of the more worse ones because it is dealing with recommendations which - concerning the original requirements of the database - are nonsence:

    "because if you don’t...

  • RE: BUFFER POOL EXTENSION EDITIONS

    aaron.bertrand (5/23/2014)


    It *is* supported on BI Edition. The docs are merely incorrect and should be updated soon.

    +1 - I was of two minds when I answered the question

    I choose Enterprise...

  • RE: Temp table limitations

    Hallo Hugo,

    aaargh - thank you for pointing to that failure.

  • RE: Temp table limitations

    Hi Steve,

    curious. I've selected "no FK" as one and only option but it gave me "failed" πŸ™‚

    However - local temptable are valid in the sessein and they can have indexes...

  • RE: Can't See The Forest For the Logins

    lyn.buchanan (3/28/2014)


    Why would you point users to the master database = only administrators should be able to access that database.

    What a nonsence!

    Everybody has access to master database by default.

    If the...

  • RE: A Questionable Trigger

    With respect - I know that preparation of a QoTD can be quite tricky and time consuming but this QoTD has the same problem as the last one; it's dealing...

  • RE: Default schema

    Good morning Anoo,

    Anoo S Pillai (4/1/2014)

    @Uwe - Even after going through the question and explanation, Do you still believe that

    If the user is member of the db_owner role the...

  • RE: Default schema

    Toreador (3/31/2014)Some people need to take a deep breath when getting a question wrong rather than immediately posting an angry response about all the points they've somehow had taken away...

Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 113 total)