Viewing 15 posts - 38,956 through 38,970 (of 39,754 total)
I'll look. I know there is an ODBC for Unix. There's also a project at GNU to translate the TDS (SQL protocol) for Unix.
Should have some info tomorrow.
Steve Jones
December 11, 2001 at 10:48 pm
I hate to say it, but you probablty need a reboot. Disable the job and then check the logs. We'll keep thinking.
Steve Jones
December 11, 2001 at 5:01 pm
December 11, 2001 at 1:38 pm
December 11, 2001 at 1:31 pm
Maybe I'm not such a good writer
. I thought I had a comprehensive article, but maybe not.... oh well.
DTS: Desgin the package and choose SAVE AS. There...
December 11, 2001 at 1:30 pm
I'd kill the spid. Try a couple kill <x>. Does this bring back a rolling back message?
Steve Jones
December 11, 2001 at 12:25 pm
I do include the DROP object because it has worked well for me and, other than tables, I like it better than ALTERs.
Addressing your items:
DBA Tools - scripts and stored...
December 11, 2001 at 12:24 pm
Never seen this. Have you changed any settings? Is there an SP appplied?
I checked my errorlogs and this isn't in them.
Steve Jones
December 11, 2001 at 10:37 am
You'd need to use a linked server and join them as a single source.
You can use the multi data pump thing, but I've never liked it. I'd prefer to use...
December 11, 2001 at 10:30 am
I tend to agree with Andy. Another thing to be aware of is that you should only return what you need. I often see select * when only a few...
December 11, 2001 at 10:27 am
December 11, 2001 at 10:24 am
December 11, 2001 at 10:23 am
I agree with Andy. Large data isn't bad. If the query performs badly, then your design might need some rethinking or use Andy's summary options.
Steve Jones
December 11, 2001 at 10:21 am
December 11, 2001 at 10:18 am
An interesting explanation. And not without merit. Part of my hesitation is that over the years I have seen more bugs (obscure) with views and temp tables than with normal...
December 11, 2001 at 10:17 am
Viewing 15 posts - 38,956 through 38,970 (of 39,754 total)