Viewing 15 posts - 21,946 through 21,960 (of 39,936 total)
Ditto, Bob, looking forward to it.
October 27, 2009 at 7:23 am
You can delete the file, and then run a full backup to test, but it should work.
There are plenty of people that create a new file name every day and...
October 27, 2009 at 7:23 am
did you create the second publication?
From there, are you looking for a push or pull subscription? I would think that you'd need to use SSMS since you have a 2005...
October 27, 2009 at 7:20 am
You might not have the right SQL Servers on your ESX system, or it might not be sized. I know of 4 companies in the Denver area that run it...
October 27, 2009 at 7:13 am
It appears that you are making multiple backups to the same file. While you can do this, and you can store multiple backups in one file, if something happens, you...
October 27, 2009 at 6:56 am
You can, you need a different name.
You can have multiple subscribers for a single publication, and you can have multiple publications, each with the same subscriber.
October 27, 2009 at 6:54 am
That job thing is really getting in the way of this social stuff.
Sorry to hear that, Jeff. Hopefully at some point we'll hoist one together
October 26, 2009 at 8:48 pm
Barry, we'll miss you. Between Grant and I, we'll raise a few.
October 26, 2009 at 8:12 pm
Note that I'm not recommending Hyper-V. I'm not sure it's any better, or any worse, than other software. I have seen VMware used heavily, and it seems to work well...
October 26, 2009 at 3:25 pm
Jack,
Good points and I do think we need to remember it's the Summit. In the past, PASS (the organization) has not offered much more than the conference.
I don't see PASS...
October 26, 2009 at 3:23 pm
Have you enabled logging? Are you using the paths for backups set by SQL Server, or have you created your own folders? Have set security correctly for the SQL Server...
October 26, 2009 at 1:10 pm
Do you mean that if I have a proc
create procedure myproc
as
exec p1
....
return
and I somehow create table from the execution of P1? If so, no, I don't think this can be...
October 26, 2009 at 12:24 pm
I've added my vote. I'm not sure I'd add it to the current output, but it would be handy to have another property added.
October 26, 2009 at 12:15 pm
CU6 was released last week. It stands on it's own.
October 26, 2009 at 12:12 pm
you can't easily do this. If the procedure returns result sets, you need code specifically in there to create the table. I cannot execute a stored procedure, get multiple result...
October 26, 2009 at 10:06 am
Viewing 15 posts - 21,946 through 21,960 (of 39,936 total)