Viewing 15 posts - 21,061 through 21,075 (of 39,936 total)
I've used domain accounts or "sa", but don't use any other user accounts. Can cause issues at times.
January 29, 2010 at 3:31 pm
How did you move the database? Are you getting similar resource counters on the new Amazon db? Are you sure there isn't network traffic delaying things?
I might update statistics as...
January 29, 2010 at 3:28 pm
The files don't change from 32 bit to 64 bit. Only operations in memory are different (using 64 bits instead of 32).
There are some driver issues in a few places,...
January 29, 2010 at 3:25 pm
That procedure stops a job that is running. It doesn't disable a job.
You need sp_update_job (http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa260379%28SQL.80%29.aspx)
January 29, 2010 at 3:22 pm
They can run together, but I usually offset them to avoid resource contention issues.
January 29, 2010 at 3:20 pm
You cannot count on the larger file being more recent. Use the RESTORE HEADERONLY commands to determine the content.
January 29, 2010 at 3:18 pm
Hasn't come back to haunt me. I almost never use that stuff. I backup to disk files, name them by date, use that for restores.
deletes
Most DR solutions include log shipping...
January 29, 2010 at 11:16 am
Yes, the ramification is that you can't query for what is contained in a backup or have SSMS automatically do a restore. The history cleanup task in the maintenance plans...
January 29, 2010 at 10:51 am
I have had some people say they burned up SSDs, but I think that was under extreme load. I have had a few people say they have used SSDs in...
January 29, 2010 at 10:34 am
I think something like a SQL Refactor from Red Gate would do this.
Are you not using Source Control? I would make sure you're doing that, and then I would look...
January 29, 2010 at 10:27 am
I would follow Lowell's advice. You need a unique constraint to ensure your data is intact, but there's no need to copy all that data over to a FK table.
January 29, 2010 at 10:22 am
You don't necessarily need to tune the design. I would move to varchar as it can save some space, which might end up making your rows denser on the tables.
If...
January 29, 2010 at 10:21 am
It's not really clear what you are asking here. You need to provide some more details.
[Moved to design forum]
January 29, 2010 at 10:18 am
I'd second a read on those articles.
You're going to face some contention no matter what. One thing to minimize it is get the audit tables onto another filegroup/disk.
January 29, 2010 at 10:17 am
You could look at an SSD drive for tempdb, which might provide some speed boost as well.
January 29, 2010 at 10:14 am
Viewing 15 posts - 21,061 through 21,075 (of 39,936 total)