Viewing 15 posts - 20,551 through 20,565 (of 39,834 total)
Please confine the discussion to the article and not attack each other.
Debating whether or not the terms used are appropriate, accurate, or even necessary is one thing. Saying that the...
March 3, 2010 at 2:50 pm
I would think snapshot isolation would help, but I'm not a replication expert. With that many changes coming through, I suspect you are going to have issues. It's like packing...
March 3, 2010 at 11:25 am
So here's what I suggest. When things are slow, check for locking/blocking. I would be concerned that someone has not setup transactional replciation and instead setup some snapshot replication, or...
March 3, 2010 at 10:48 am
I think we win the Olympics, though we should. Lots of $$$ and people. No excuse for not doing well.
March 3, 2010 at 8:40 am
I was thinking of the same thing as Lowell, a central table with an identity used to seed the other tables.
March 3, 2010 at 8:20 am
Thanks for the update. That is an interesting behavior, makes me wonder how they are building connection strings in the plans.
March 3, 2010 at 8:13 am
Five of six years ago Microsoft published some surveys that showed about 100,000 MCDBAs, but closer to 1,000,000 people calling themselves SQL Server DBAs. Most people don't have certs, in...
March 3, 2010 at 7:53 am
I'm confused what you mean by the subscriber is not accessible? Replication runs continuously, so is the subscriber never accessible? Or do you have scheduled subscription pull/push?
I haven't seen...
March 3, 2010 at 7:49 am
Irony indeed.
I don't think it would be that hard to enable some features in Enterprise edition. I would love to be able to buy a few of the high end...
March 3, 2010 at 7:47 am
There's no way to do this automatically. You would have to write code, either with triggers that handle things, or with some other management from your application. Even with triggers,...
March 3, 2010 at 7:44 am
Ah, good catch, jcncarter.
In 2000, only 2GB is supported for Std. This was a 2005 forum, so I wasn't thinking. Won't matter in that case.
March 3, 2010 at 7:10 am
I was searching for as reference, but can't find one. I believe Jason is correct, SQL Server, 32 bit, needs AWE to access more than 2GB of RAM.
March 3, 2010 at 7:08 am
Both scary and reassuring. You can make a mistake and keep your job, but why wouldn't this be a terminating offense?
March 2, 2010 at 3:13 pm
Identity could be tough. What about someone that purchases, say beer, and wants to remove that? Not sure that's a valid removal item. Some places are also required to have...
March 2, 2010 at 1:20 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 20,551 through 20,565 (of 39,834 total)