Viewing 15 posts - 16,321 through 16,335 (of 39,827 total)
Look at Target Server Memory for each instance. This is what each SQL instance would like to have. Chances are it will be high, but you might get a proportional...
April 20, 2011 at 11:03 am
I haven't heard of any good ones. It's a hard problem to solve visually and most vendors have avoided it.
April 20, 2011 at 11:00 am
the storage format isn't really important. The display is what is important. Display formatting is separate from how the data is stored.
AFAIK, you will have to convert this hours to...
April 20, 2011 at 10:59 am
First, always back up locally. this ought to be scheduled and not a big deal.
If you are looking to transfer them to a central location, that's a copy function. Across...
April 20, 2011 at 10:53 am
What I'd recommend is that you shrink it a little, perhaps 25GB, then the do an index rebuild. So schedule those operations together, in that order.
Once that's done, check free...
April 20, 2011 at 10:50 am
The problem with multi-connect scripts is that they sometimes fail and blow up. What I might look to do is have each server execute the query and store the results...
April 20, 2011 at 10:49 am
It will work, but this isn't a great way to store and query this data. You ought to look at refactoring this over time and storing those "slots" in another...
April 20, 2011 at 10:36 am
You might look at some of these.
http://www.sqlservercentral.com/search/?q=restore+backup&t=s
April 20, 2011 at 10:22 am
Grant Fritchey (4/20/2011)
I can't comment on the kick-back program as it's currently configured. Suffice to say, if you've received a check, you earned it.
And if you've received a kick, you...
April 20, 2011 at 10:21 am
Can you define what is "slower"? Is it specific queries? Do you still have the old server and can you check specific items to see if they are really slower?
Gail...
April 20, 2011 at 10:17 am
Right click the folder, properties, select security. Look for the account or a group.
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc757520%28WS.10%29.aspx
April 20, 2011 at 8:27 am
blandry (4/20/2011)
April 20, 2011 at 8:19 am
Gus has a good explanation. shared locks are compatible with other shared locks. It's exclusive locks that block, or Intent Exclusive locks.
You can see lock compatibility here: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms186396.aspx
April 19, 2011 at 11:32 am
CirquedeSQLeil (4/15/2011)
Jeff Moden (4/10/2011)
April 19, 2011 at 8:46 am
It's not clear what you mean with your backup schedule. You need to specifically state when you have an NT backup running and when you have a SQL backup running...
April 19, 2011 at 8:45 am
Viewing 15 posts - 16,321 through 16,335 (of 39,827 total)