Viewing 15 posts - 1,216 through 1,230 (of 5,393 total)
This thread is six years old.
If your replies are relevant, there's no need to create sock-puppet accounts to post them.
-- Gianluca Sartori
May 8, 2014 at 7:17 am
I hope you noticed that this thread is 5 years old.
-- Gianluca Sartori
May 8, 2014 at 7:14 am
It's unclear to me what you want to achieve.
If you're trying to generate the CREATE SYNONYM statements, you can do it this way:
DECLARE @DATABASENAME sysname;
DECLARE @sql NVARCHAR(max);
SET @DATABASENAME = 'master'
SET...
-- Gianluca Sartori
May 8, 2014 at 7:05 am
You're welcome.
Glad I could help
-- Gianluca Sartori
May 8, 2014 at 5:46 am
You can use sp_estimate_data_compression_savings
-- Gianluca Sartori
May 8, 2014 at 5:18 am
Yes, it can be done.
Each partition can be rebuilt using a different compression settings.
ALTER TABLE table_name
REBUILD PARTITION = partition_number
WITH (DATA_COMPRESSION = NONE|ROW|PAGE)
-- Gianluca Sartori
May 8, 2014 at 5:11 am
I suggest that you start a new thread. Very few people monitor old threads.
-- Gianluca Sartori
May 8, 2014 at 4:49 am
Do publisher and subscriber have the same server collation?
-- Gianluca Sartori
May 8, 2014 at 4:25 am
Many ways to troubleshoot a Linked Server can be found in this article: http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/Linked+Servers/73794/
-- Gianluca Sartori
May 8, 2014 at 2:47 am
2,5 GB for the OS might not be enough.
Also consider that you're controlling just single page allocations with Max Server Memory. All other allocations are not included in that figure.
See...
-- Gianluca Sartori
May 6, 2014 at 3:57 pm
Ok, so no resource exhaustion event.
You should monitor the memory counters in Windows and see if they get too low.
If this is a SQL Server only box, you could lower...
-- Gianluca Sartori
May 5, 2014 at 2:20 pm
Is this a SQL Server 2005 or 2008?
I'm asking because you posted in the 2008 forums but you said it's a 2005 instance.
However, if you have many insufficient memory errors,...
-- Gianluca Sartori
May 5, 2014 at 12:28 pm
does it degrade performance on DML statements ?
Is it good to have both indexes on same column ?
In general, it's not a good thing. In case of a clustered...
-- Gianluca Sartori
May 5, 2014 at 10:56 am
I have no idea. It is maybe pointing to a different schema/database?
It's hard to know without tracing what the provider actually tries to query.
-- Gianluca Sartori
May 5, 2014 at 8:59 am
Viewing 15 posts - 1,216 through 1,230 (of 5,393 total)