Viewing 15 posts - 2,116 through 2,130 (of 5,394 total)
okbangas (1/13/2012)
so I have to create the table on before hand. 🙂
Or use dynamic SQL. That would work as well.
January 13, 2012 at 8:03 am
I suppose snapshot replication would be overkill... but still an option!
January 13, 2012 at 7:58 am
Good luck!
Glad you sorted it out.
Another way could have been declaring Conn without type declaration (it becomes a variant that way) and then assign the object:
Dim Conn
Set Conn = createObject("ADODB.Connection")
January 13, 2012 at 7:53 am
george sibbald (1/12/2012)
I don't see how a drop column can be batched
Quite true, but you could batch UPDATEs to set the column to NULL. Once every row is set...
January 12, 2012 at 10:53 am
Lowell (1/12/2012)
January 12, 2012 at 10:50 am
An alternative method...
WITH SampleData (Entry) AS (
SELECT 8.55
UNION ALL
SELECT 90.07
)
SELECT Solution = REPLICATE('0',(3-len(floor(Entry))))+ cast(Entry as nchar(20)),
Alternative = REPLACE(STR(Entry,6,2),SPACE(1),'0')
FROM SampleData
January 12, 2012 at 10:20 am
I have no idea what that CLSID is, but this article (on a totally different topic) describes how to grant launch permissions on a CLSID on Win2008:
http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/Linked+Servers/73794/
Hope this helps
Gianluca
January 12, 2012 at 10:14 am
What do you mean with "fail"?
Care to share the error message?
January 12, 2012 at 10:10 am
Don't overlook Brandie's suggestions. Fix the server first of all.
January 12, 2012 at 6:49 am
IMHO, no. Taking FULL backups is much easier.
January 12, 2012 at 6:47 am
I see. What about moving the binary data in a separate filegroup and perform a partial backup?
Compression won't probably help in this case, because images are usually already compressed.
January 12, 2012 at 6:36 am
Yes, it can be done moving the table to a different database and creating a view with the same name in the original database.
Be careful: some things, such as foreign...
January 12, 2012 at 6:07 am
azdzn (1/12/2012)
Sometimes page split can lead to duplicate rows.Have a look at this article :
http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/tonyrogerson/archive/2006/11/10/1280.aspx
+1
This is the case most likely.
Another good reason not to use NOLOCK.
January 12, 2012 at 6:04 am
Then, I think there's not much you can do.
January 12, 2012 at 4:10 am
Viewing 15 posts - 2,116 through 2,130 (of 5,394 total)