Viewing 15 posts - 136 through 150 (of 255 total)
Okay, latest changes are almost done. Still have more ideas but I at least want to get something posted ASAP. Here are the upcoming changes:
Reformatted the code
Bug fixes
Moved the @Recipients...
September 13, 2013 at 6:34 am
Hi, Joe.
I just realized that this uses an undocumented feature. I already have one in the script and I try to avoid them like the plague (just in case!). I...
September 12, 2013 at 1:28 pm
Thank you! A lot of changes are coming in the next version BTW. 🙂
September 12, 2013 at 10:00 am
There is also an "enable" field in the msdb.dbo.sysjobs table. From the looks of it this shows if the job is enabled as whole, while your code shows if the...
September 12, 2013 at 9:27 am
Steven, this is great! Thank you such much for taking the time to do this for everyone. 🙂
September 12, 2013 at 5:57 am
Nice catch! Thank you! I will review and add it to the next update. 🙂
September 11, 2013 at 5:12 pm
No, not yet. Very few changes in a long time actually. SSC just decided to re-feature it despite nothing really new in the script.
September 11, 2013 at 9:08 am
Thanks for the kind words. 🙂 Funny thing is I too had a similar situation with one colleague. Changed his tune too once he saw the power behind it. 🙂
September 9, 2013 at 8:05 am
Thanks for all the feedback everyone. Again, just more of an FYI about the behavior of the sp. It just caught me off gaurd when I realized it worked this...
August 30, 2013 at 7:02 am
As I said, it's just more of an FYI as to how it works.
August 29, 2013 at 9:35 pm
Lesson is use the complete name. For example, rather than using "advanced options" use "show advanced options". If MS ever introduces "hide advanced options" then you may need to rewrite...
August 29, 2013 at 9:25 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 136 through 150 (of 255 total)