Viewing 15 posts - 466 through 480 (of 2,436 total)
The only clear cut case that I can think of to support 'virtualization' in production. The case has a number of prerequisites:
-small to medium databases - usually less than 50...
June 17, 2008 at 4:01 pm
Are you sure that there are not network connectivity issues between the 2 servers ?
Have you also checked with the Windows Admins to see if they are having any AD...
June 17, 2008 at 12:44 pm
Is you local environment just a LAN or do you also have WAN connectivity ?
If you have a LAN/WAN environment are only WAN connections affected ?
Are only a specific subgroups...
June 17, 2008 at 9:36 am
Valid points Jeff. I too have failed 'multiple guess' tests - some home grown, others from services. Likewise I may have met some of those same 'certified' professionals as well....
June 17, 2008 at 8:29 am
Good points Jeff. However I would add the caveat that pre-screening testing is always acceptable via services such as BrainBench and ProveIt. As you say it is a pleasant surprise...
June 17, 2008 at 7:37 am
... hmmm ... the SQL Agent runs as LocalService ... you can execute the package under your Windows Credentials with the target on another server ... try using a Domain...
June 16, 2008 at 2:44 pm
Short of using a procedure or TSQL to query sysprocesses the easiest and safest thing if to just ALTER the database OFFLINE. It is relatively harmless unless soimeone is actually...
June 16, 2008 at 2:36 pm
The only way to truly know that a backup of a database is 'reliable' is to schedule test restores of databases on a regular basis of different databases on different...
June 11, 2008 at 8:17 am
... hmmmm ...
So no new users can connect I assume. I am going to go out on a limb and assume that there is not really an AD guy at...
June 10, 2008 at 11:34 am
How about 'setting execution context' instead of a 'use' statement:
exec sp_msforeachdb 'exec ?..sp_spaceused'
December 14, 2007 at 9:28 am
I have been in similar situations before. In all situations, lest one, I have held my ground and asked for an email stating the nature of the request and what...
December 14, 2007 at 8:57 am
Not a day goes by when the forums at SSC do not teach me something new - thanks Gail !
December 10, 2007 at 12:07 pm
Give this KB a whirl: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/832524
December 10, 2007 at 11:36 am
... hmmm ... sounds a lot like process and procedures to me ... as for the communication, well does that not ring true to professionalism and responsibility ???
December 10, 2007 at 9:29 am
Viewing 15 posts - 466 through 480 (of 2,436 total)