Viewing 15 posts - 2,221 through 2,235 (of 2,436 total)
No always ... with no index on the column a 'table scan' would be used. With an index on the column, worst case, an 'index scan' is performed. Still not...
April 29, 2005 at 9:52 am
All the software in the world will not help (no matter how good it is or it's review or cost) unless there is 'management'. Primarily I mean project management (your...
April 29, 2005 at 9:45 am
I also believe that the optimizer works better with "=VALUE" as opposed to "!=VALUE" or "<>VALUE" if the column is indexed.
April 29, 2005 at 9:34 am
The only issues that I am aware of are covered in the following link:
I am also assuming that you are installing SP3 in an automated fashion as well.
April 29, 2005 at 9:08 am
A DBA is only as good as his last restore ...
April 28, 2005 at 9:39 am
I've had this problem in the past a few times. Depending on the privileges of the logins (whether you use integrated security or SQL security does not really matter), you may have...
April 28, 2005 at 9:06 am
Just a questions:
Are there any objects that begin with '1' in the database ?
If so, then it needs to be renamed or escaped ... e.g. N'1 table'
April 28, 2005 at 8:57 am
dc, you are correct since they are using local disk. In my environment this is not an issue since all databases (data/log/backup) are on separate SAN Meta-LUNs. So the worries...
April 27, 2005 at 12:38 pm
Here's a 'must have' for every DBA's desktop ... it's an electronic version of the systemtables in databases ...
http://www.microsoft.com/sql/techinfo/productdoc/2000/systables.asp
April 27, 2005 at 10:06 am
There is one advantage to using 3 separate databases (one table in each) vs. 3 tables in one database that has been overlooked. This is the distribution of transaction log activity....
April 27, 2005 at 10:03 am
Here's a few questions for your SAN admin to start with ...
1) What RAID Level are you using (1,5 or 1+0) ?
>>> The different RAID levels determine optimim read or write...
April 21, 2005 at 12:25 pm
Presently I am not certified ('certifiable' possibly). I've worked with SQL Server since v4.2 on NT v3.5. My thoughts on certification are, well it's just not cost effective nor...
April 21, 2005 at 9:49 am
Your SAN administrator should have software provided by the vendor(s) available for performance monitoring. e.g. EMC, Hitachi and maybe Veritas if you are utilizing the disk management software. The catch...
April 21, 2005 at 8:51 am
Here's the scenario:
SQL Cluster HP-DL580/HP-DL380 - active/passive
4 - 3.0 Gh Xeon CPUs
4 Gb RAM --> 3 Gb dedicated to SQL Server
EMC SAN storage --> db data/db logs on separate meta-LUNs
Database size...
April 21, 2005 at 8:43 am
Viewing 15 posts - 2,221 through 2,235 (of 2,436 total)