Viewing 15 posts - 2,656 through 2,670 (of 2,840 total)
Brandie Tarvin (3/19/2008)
MAAAAAAATTTTTT!!!!
I'm supposed to be working on serious ETL stuff today! You're not allowed to make me laugh so hard that my boss glares at me from...
March 19, 2008 at 12:02 pm
Just for the kick of it, today I took the brainbench test for SQL 2005 Administration.
I took Basic level for starters and I got 3.14. And when I took Intermediate...
March 19, 2008 at 9:47 am
It is a claim actually. Basically what they say is since the bats eats a certain fruit (not a common fruit, I forgot the name) and that fruit is actually...
March 18, 2008 at 12:32 pm
How in heavens name did we end up with exotic food when talking about interview:D
Since the topic is already there, has anyone had Bat? You know , the flying wolf......
March 18, 2008 at 12:13 pm
If it is a new index then I dont see why you need to do an Update statistics.
March 18, 2008 at 10:36 am
You could set Isolation Level read Uncommitted for the whole stored proc that has the select that causes dead locks
March 17, 2008 at 7:37 am
Thank You all for the feedback. I appreciate it very much.
March 11, 2008 at 7:03 am
I agree with sreinster. If there are really no compelling reason for this, then they should be completely qualified. In your case 3 part qualification. Especially if your DBs are...
March 10, 2008 at 1:50 pm
Sideout, Yes it is always better to call objects with their qualifier.
March 10, 2008 at 10:19 am
Hey Jack,
Thanks for the excel file. Thats a pretty good testing.. 🙂
March 10, 2008 at 9:42 am
Hi Paul,
Yes, you are right. I had both 2005 and 2000 installed in my local box and ran the tests under 2000 instance.
March 10, 2008 at 9:09 am
Hi srienstr,
No, Even if you provide the DB and the object qualifier, it will still go through all the hassles of Acquiring a Lock and then releasing it.
March 10, 2008 at 9:07 am
Thats a very generic question to ask without providing any details. But I would venture to say first get all the documentations that has been completed so far. Also try...
March 10, 2008 at 8:40 am
Thats one of the craziest thing to do....:D
And the surprising part is that it worked for you...lol
March 10, 2008 at 8:34 am
Hi Gregory, Thats worth a try. I will try to do that and see if I can find anything.
Jack, Thanks for answering that. I was not sure about it...
March 10, 2008 at 8:18 am
Viewing 15 posts - 2,656 through 2,670 (of 2,840 total)