Viewing 15 posts - 196 through 210 (of 1,354 total)
two different measure groups. for Actual Sales and Projected Sales
Are the really two different measure groups or two different measure in the same measure group? Have you tried...
July 12, 2018 at 7:36 am
As it seems as if you're waiting for an answer, I'm not going to be able to look at this until the weekend. I want to review one of my...
July 12, 2018 at 7:30 am
If that field is subject to modification, that might be a real problem.
If that were true, it wouldn't be something he should be aggregating on. I have...
July 9, 2018 at 9:52 am
Make sure you cluster on whatever field is aggregated. Otherwise the engine will have to do table scans.
July 9, 2018 at 9:17 am
Some of those issues reflect inertia and misplaced trust. Both Truman and the UN wanted to reunite Korea per pre-war UN declarations. But only if the Chinese wouldn't intervene. Given MacArthur's...
July 7, 2018 at 7:08 pm
I am stuck in a dilemma
It's a small but not unimportant choice--a dilemma is a choice between undesirable alternatives. You simply have a choice, as I have...
July 5, 2018 at 7:10 am
Romac - Tuesday, June 26, 2018 4:49 AMEnemies?
It's just a headline grabber. He uses the more appropriate term "competitors" at the end...
June 26, 2018 at 11:08 am
iif(CoalesceEmpty([Measures].[Claim Paid Count],0) = 0
, [Measures].[Reserve]
,[Measures].[Reserve] / [Measures].[Claim Paid Count])
That's not particularly "kludgy", but since you are using 2014 you should be able...
June 20, 2018 at 3:01 pm
Why can't one of the fact measure groups have a single contract as the granularity and the measures are the aggregations (whether count or sum)?
June 20, 2018 at 12:09 pm
Distinct counts are tricky and generally if not universally require their own fact measure group in a cube. Based on what you are saying, what immediately springs to my mind...
June 20, 2018 at 8:18 am
If there is a useable business key on the fact table, use it for the primary key, usually though without clustering it. That's not always possible, but often the fact...
June 19, 2018 at 5:43 pm
Nothing has changed my original view that each row is a trip with columns for pickup and drop off information. The drop off information is null until the...
June 19, 2018 at 8:42 am
I wouldn't use a view either. I find no use for them in an OLTP environment. There are a couple of situations where they are useful. I just haven't had...
June 19, 2018 at 7:27 am
Although there is some good merit in a guaranteed "only 2 values" (pickup/dropoff) type of table, a proper CROSSTAB would likely blow the doors off of any view you...
June 18, 2018 at 2:21 pm
You also may want to consider reworking the table if possible. If a completed trip consists of both a pickup and a drop off, they could be the same record. ...
June 18, 2018 at 11:49 am
Viewing 15 posts - 196 through 210 (of 1,354 total)