Viewing 15 posts - 196 through 210 (of 1,353 total)
As it seems as if you're waiting for an answer, I'm not going to be able to look at this until the weekend. I want to review one of my...
July 12, 2018 at 7:30 am
If that field is subject to modification, that might be a real problem.
If that were true, it wouldn't be something he should be aggregating on. I have...
July 9, 2018 at 9:52 am
Make sure you cluster on whatever field is aggregated. Otherwise the engine will have to do table scans.
July 9, 2018 at 9:17 am
Some of those issues reflect inertia and misplaced trust. Both Truman and the UN wanted to reunite Korea per pre-war UN declarations. But only if the Chinese wouldn't intervene. Given MacArthur's...
July 7, 2018 at 7:08 pm
I am stuck in a dilemma
It's a small but not unimportant choice--a dilemma is a choice between undesirable alternatives. You simply have a choice, as I have...
July 5, 2018 at 7:10 am
Romac - Tuesday, June 26, 2018 4:49 AMEnemies?
It's just a headline grabber. He uses the more appropriate term "competitors" at the end...
June 26, 2018 at 11:08 am
iif(CoalesceEmpty([Measures].[Claim Paid Count],0) = 0
, [Measures].[Reserve]
,[Measures].[Reserve] / [Measures].[Claim Paid Count])
That's not particularly "kludgy", but since you are using 2014 you should be able...
June 20, 2018 at 3:01 pm
Why can't one of the fact measure groups have a single contract as the granularity and the measures are the aggregations (whether count or sum)?
June 20, 2018 at 12:09 pm
Distinct counts are tricky and generally if not universally require their own fact measure group in a cube. Based on what you are saying, what immediately springs to my mind...
June 20, 2018 at 8:18 am
If there is a useable business key on the fact table, use it for the primary key, usually though without clustering it. That's not always possible, but often the fact...
June 19, 2018 at 5:43 pm
Nothing has changed my original view that each row is a trip with columns for pickup and drop off information. The drop off information is null until the...
June 19, 2018 at 8:42 am
I wouldn't use a view either. I find no use for them in an OLTP environment. There are a couple of situations where they are useful. I just haven't had...
June 19, 2018 at 7:27 am
Although there is some good merit in a guaranteed "only 2 values" (pickup/dropoff) type of table, a proper CROSSTAB would likely blow the doors off of any view you...
June 18, 2018 at 2:21 pm
You also may want to consider reworking the table if possible. If a completed trip consists of both a pickup and a drop off, they could be the same record. ...
June 18, 2018 at 11:49 am
Applying CU1 to SP2 resolved the issues we were having. If you use SSAS and apply SP2, you should plan to apply CU1 as well.
June 6, 2018 at 11:13 am
Viewing 15 posts - 196 through 210 (of 1,353 total)