Viewing 15 posts - 13,426 through 13,440 (of 13,876 total)
Here's another way that might be faster as it's not doing the CONVERTs
SELECT floor(0.4799608993157 * 1000) / 1000
August 8, 2005 at 11:07 am
Following your own explanation, surely the formula is
UNION ALL = UNION + duplicates
?
August 8, 2005 at 6:30 am
Somethink like this might be what you need:
ALTER DATABASE <dbname> SET SINGLE_USER WITH ROLLBACK IMMEDIATE
go
Regards
August 8, 2005 at 4:55 am
I don't think that this is enough detail.
Can you also possibly include some sample source data and what you are seeing - highlighting the spurious rows.
Regards
August 8, 2005 at 4:51 am
OK - can you provide a small sample of the data you have and what you want to be returned. No need to include all of the existing GROUP BY...
August 8, 2005 at 3:43 am
Take a look at the INFORMATION_SCHEMA views in BOL - you'll get the constraints from there. But the actual CREATE script - not available from a system view as far...
August 8, 2005 at 3:15 am
Yes, use Query Analyser. Open the Object Browser and browse to the table you wish to script. Right click it and select 'Script object to new window as / Create'...
August 8, 2005 at 2:57 am
The error messages, in this case, are accurate and I presume that you understand why they are appearing. I have no experience of Sybase, so I cannot comment on why...
August 8, 2005 at 2:52 am
Try this for SP level:
SELECT SERVERPROPERTY ('productlevel')
August 5, 2005 at 4:39 am
One of the simplest ways is to change your data to a consistent format, eg:
1.00, 1.01, 1.02, ..., 1.10
would work.
But if that doesn't suit, you need to write some...
August 4, 2005 at 1:28 pm
You are correct ... SQL Server treats nulls as special and you will often find that comparison operators (= <> etc) do not return rows where one of the items...
August 4, 2005 at 1:23 pm
So your first query is to return a list of valid clients - and then you need to join that with 'table'.
To select valid clients:
select distinct t.client from table t...
August 4, 2005 at 11:41 am
Hey, you guys are ganging up on me ... it was late, I was tired & just trying to help ![]()
Anyway, my solution requires...
August 4, 2005 at 10:23 am
Would it be simpler to do this in two stages - using two resultsets (one for each 'type' of records)?
August 3, 2005 at 5:27 pm
select 'in table1 not table2' Type, t1.id from table1 t1 where t1.id not in (select t2.id from table2 t2)
union
select 'in table2 not table1' Type, t3.id from table2 t3 where t3.id...
August 3, 2005 at 5:19 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 13,426 through 13,440 (of 13,876 total)