Viewing 15 posts - 6,916 through 6,930 (of 9,241 total)
what issues are you expecting or considering??
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Ya can't make an omelette without breaking just a few eggs" 😉
July 14, 2011 at 2:54 am
SQL Server buffer pool is typically the largest memory consumer, have you accounted for this?
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Ya can't make an omelette without breaking just a few eggs" 😉
July 14, 2011 at 2:49 am
thanoseft (7/14/2011)
and i do not want it to run while i restarting
???????
All operations are rolled back anyway. Do what you must but there is no need to disable the jobs...
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Ya can't make an omelette without breaking just a few eggs" 😉
July 14, 2011 at 1:32 am
garfield81 (7/13/2011)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Ya can't make an omelette without breaking just a few eggs" 😉
July 13, 2011 at 3:50 pm
this link provides full details
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Ya can't make an omelette without breaking just a few eggs" 😉
July 13, 2011 at 3:47 pm
SVR (7/12/2011)
I am using sql server 2008 on win 2008. I restored a database from sql server 2000 to 2008, and also installed the application using...
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Ya can't make an omelette without breaking just a few eggs" 😉
July 13, 2011 at 9:11 am
you don't need to disable the jobs to restart the instance!!
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Ya can't make an omelette without breaking just a few eggs" 😉
July 13, 2011 at 9:00 am
how many databases on the server are 90 compatibility
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Ya can't make an omelette without breaking just a few eggs" 😉
July 12, 2011 at 4:17 pm
geenrally you dont want to use the sql server service account as the security principal for your endpoints. Create a base domain user, grant login to sql server and grant...
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Ya can't make an omelette without breaking just a few eggs" 😉
July 12, 2011 at 4:09 pm
tobyteel (7/12/2011)
Why would you want to do this? What does this achieve?
I thought that was clear from the introduction, thanks for your feedback
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Ya can't make an omelette without breaking just a few eggs" 😉
July 12, 2011 at 2:24 pm
thats the latest version which i'm not using in the tutorial and there is a vast difference. try this link for v7 stable release
http://sourceforge.net/projects/freenas/files/FreeNAS-7-Stable/[/url]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Ya can't make an omelette without breaking just a few eggs" 😉
July 12, 2011 at 1:27 pm
RAID10 can offer fast reads depending upon the controller used. Modern RAID10 arrays will read from all online disks to improve performance
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Ya can't make an omelette without breaking just a few eggs" 😉
July 12, 2011 at 1:24 pm
pshaship (7/12/2011)
Below are the error messages from the errorlog
On Principal server's error log:
Database mirroring connection error 4 'An error occurred while receiving data: '10054(An existing connection was...
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Ya can't make an omelette without breaking just a few eggs" 😉
July 12, 2011 at 1:21 pm
RAID5 and RAID6 have the overhead of parity calculations. RAID10 write performance is much better.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Ya can't make an omelette without breaking just a few eggs" 😉
July 12, 2011 at 10:02 am
you were upgrading this instance is that correct?
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Ya can't make an omelette without breaking just a few eggs" 😉
July 12, 2011 at 9:41 am
Viewing 15 posts - 6,916 through 6,930 (of 9,241 total)