Viewing 15 posts - 4,171 through 4,185 (of 9,253 total)
rcheneyjr (4/17/2013)
April 22, 2013 at 3:02 pm
You will likely need changes to your network infrastructure and shared storage infrastructure but you should be able to relocate the once you have the above sorted
April 22, 2013 at 10:19 am
Whatever you use whether it be
Remember that server level objects such as logins, agent jobs, etc, etc need to be replicated...
April 22, 2013 at 1:16 am
This thread is nearly 2 years old!!
April 22, 2013 at 12:32 am
A schema is used to collectively identify set objects, the schema can also be used to control permission lists defining access to the collective objects. Users create objects under schemas...
April 22, 2013 at 12:06 am
You could also use
SELECT *
FROM sys.objects
WHERE is_ms_shipped<>1
April 20, 2013 at 8:05 am
vishalsurya50 (4/19/2013)
In sql server 2012 creating a cluster , i had added servers and the next step is Access point for administering the cluster which i need to...
April 20, 2013 at 7:48 am
Have you checked the maintenance plan history?
April 19, 2013 at 10:09 am
prettsons (3/26/2013)
Simple recovery model allows restore database only up to the last full backup
Up to the last differential backup actually, as long as you're taking diff backups of course 😉
April 19, 2013 at 10:06 am
TheSQLGuru (4/18/2013)
April 18, 2013 at 8:45 am
The whole point of AlwaysOn is that you don't have shared storage. There's nothing to say that the disks cant be SAN based but they're not shared across the windows...
April 18, 2013 at 6:56 am
gamit124 (3/28/2013)
hiwhen i am taking full backup and i am restoring full back up
i am getting error like "the database is not accessible"
please help me
regards,
gamit
Are you getting this...
April 18, 2013 at 12:15 am
Markus (4/17/2013)
Throwing hardware at an issue sometimes is just not the answer.
It's something you see time and time again and you're right it's a futile\costly exercise.
April 17, 2013 at 11:19 am
dan-572483 (4/17/2013)
Does pausing the passive node you're installing on have the same effect and is an equally valid action?
This was only really necessary under Windows 2003 clusters. Windows\sql 2008 have...
April 17, 2013 at 7:47 am
the reason for removing the passive node as a possible owner on the networkname resource is to avoid the situation where you're patching the passive node and half way through...
April 17, 2013 at 7:12 am
Viewing 15 posts - 4,171 through 4,185 (of 9,253 total)