Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 4,126 through 4,140 (of 9,244 total)

  • RE: Ownership of cluster disk 'Cluster Disk xxx has been unexpectedly lost by this node.

    ginolard (5/8/2013)


    Right, well, the person who installed this cluster (who was fired some months ago) appears to have decided to use BOTH.

    Probably why they were fired 😉

    Use either\or never both.

    ginolard...

    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    "Ya can't make an omelette without breaking just a few eggs" 😉

  • RE: Ownership of cluster disk 'Cluster Disk xxx has been unexpectedly lost by this node.

    ginolard (5/8/2013)


    Nice article thanks.

    You're welcome, I hope you found it useful

    ginolard (5/8/2013)


    One small question though. In the case (such as ours) where we have TWO iSCSI NICs per...

    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    "Ya can't make an omelette without breaking just a few eggs" 😉

  • RE: SQL 2012 AG/FCI Failover

    SQLSACT (5/8/2013)


    One more thing, previously I have set up an AG combined with FCI

    Now, I am setting up an AG with no FCI - Because both nodes are in the...

    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    "Ya can't make an omelette without breaking just a few eggs" 😉

  • RE: Ownership of cluster disk 'Cluster Disk xxx has been unexpectedly lost by this node.

    ginolard (5/7/2013)


    The iSCSI initiator properties for ALL targets are set to

    Local Adapater: Default

    Initiator IP: Default

    Target Portal IP: Default

    Are you saying these values should be changed to this?

    Local Adapater: Microsoft...

    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    "Ya can't make an omelette without breaking just a few eggs" 😉

  • RE: SQL 2012 AG/FCI Failover

    SQLSACT (5/7/2013)


    So I understand that when combining FCI with AG, automatic database failover is gone

    Yes that is correct.

    SQLSACT (5/7/2013)


    but you still have automatic instance failover. Am I correct in this?

    Yes...

    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    "Ya can't make an omelette without breaking just a few eggs" 😉

  • RE: Ownership of cluster disk 'Cluster Disk xxx has been unexpectedly lost by this node.

    sql-lover (5/6/2013)


    it happened again. Now, not sure if it was the same or not.

    I'll take notice though, thanks for reply.

    Have you made the changes in the iscsi initiator?

    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    "Ya can't make an omelette without breaking just a few eggs" 😉

  • RE: Ownership of cluster disk 'Cluster Disk xxx has been unexpectedly lost by this node.

    sql-lover (5/2/2013)


    -Change the network binding order. Put HeartBeat second and SAN last (SAN was 2nd and heartbeat the last one)

    I can sort of see why but I don't see this...

    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    "Ya can't make an omelette without breaking just a few eggs" 😉

  • RE: Ports and Firewall changes for named Instance

    Check windows firewall, also check remote connections are enabled to sql server too.

    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    "Ya can't make an omelette without breaking just a few eggs" 😉

  • RE: Ports and Firewall changes for named Instance

    More detail may be found here

    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    "Ya can't make an omelette without breaking just a few eggs" 😉

  • RE: Ports and Firewall changes for named Instance

    Sqlism (4/30/2013)


    Hi All,

    What all ports should be opened for a named instance, which is listeneing on 1477.

    The named instance name is PDCZV\CZV01

    When security opened port number 1477, the developers are...

    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    "Ya can't make an omelette without breaking just a few eggs" 😉

  • RE: Validate Disk Access Latency:No disks were found on which to perform cluster validation tests.

    vishalsurya50 (4/29/2013)


    Hi ,

    I get the following below error .Kindly check and let me know what should be done in initiating iscsi disk.

    Validate Disk Access Latency

    Description: Validate acceptable latency for disk...

    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    "Ya can't make an omelette without breaking just a few eggs" 😉

  • RE: count(*) vs count(1) or count(id)

    Count(*) includes rows with null values whereas count(id) would not include rows with a null id. Unlikely if the id is a primary key though, so it does depend on...

    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    "Ya can't make an omelette without breaking just a few eggs" 😉

  • RE: Cluster configuration corrupted

    One question springs to mind

    If you had a resource in your cluster group marked as failed why on earth would you think the update would still be successful??

    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    "Ya can't make an omelette without breaking just a few eggs" 😉

  • RE: cluster validation test failing while adding node to the existing cluster group

    deep_kkumar (4/30/2013)


    cluster validation test failing at Validate SCSI Device Vital Product Data (VPD) test. There's a hot fix to resolve this issue(http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2531907/en-us?sd=rss&spid=14134) But when we apply this hotfix, server is...

    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    "Ya can't make an omelette without breaking just a few eggs" 😉

  • RE: Proper way to move data in large filegroup using DBCC SHRINKFILE emptyfile option

    Isabelle2378 (4/30/2013)


    Hi,

    I have a filegroup with one large datafile that is 300GB and I want to create 10- 30GB files and spread the data across them for better performance.

    Create a...

    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    "Ya can't make an omelette without breaking just a few eggs" 😉

Viewing 15 posts - 4,126 through 4,140 (of 9,244 total)