Viewing 15 posts - 601 through 615 (of 832 total)
GilaMonster is correct--it's fairly trivial to set up a SQL script that can be called via SQLCMD in a scheduled task to do backups. We have a SQL Express install...
December 23, 2010 at 6:09 am
Steve Jones - SSC Editor (12/22/2010)Just don't forget that lots of companies still have 3-4 year old hardware they are running.
I would have thought that even 3-4 year old hardware...
December 23, 2010 at 6:00 am
I would maybe look at upgrading the network to 1Gpbs throughout. 100Mbps may seem plenty fast enough, but running absolutely flat out it will take more than four hours to...
December 22, 2010 at 12:58 am
I agree with SQLKiwi. One of the important things about the 64-bit version of SQL server is that it's entirely compatible with the 32-bit version, even down to the data...
December 22, 2010 at 12:54 am
pavanr (12/21/2010)
but can anyone explain, here in the case of Clustered Index, why it picks third record...
December 22, 2010 at 12:50 am
Out of interest, how fast is the network connection between these two servers? You don't specify.
December 21, 2010 at 3:34 am
I was expecting the answer to be something along the lines of things are always returned in the clustered index order (which would obviously raise questions in any case), but...
December 21, 2010 at 3:20 am
I wonder just how many SQL Server Express installations there are out there doing major workloads--that's 32-bit only (and limited to 1Gb of RAM to boot)! So long as the...
December 21, 2010 at 3:16 am
ben.mcintyre (12/20/2010)
(some innocuous queries hanging, not being able to copy the tabular result set in any sensible way ...)
I'm curious--what would you class as a "sensible way"? I've often copied...
December 21, 2010 at 1:25 am
Ninja's_RGR'us (12/16/2010)
December 17, 2010 at 3:38 am
I think SQL Management Studio is actually under-appreciated. I was just having to do some work on a client's SQL 2000 install, and I'd forgotten what a pain it is...
December 17, 2010 at 3:16 am
I'm unclear on what you're asking. If you're basically saying that you need to get Performance Monitor information from a time when you weren't actually running Performance Monitor, then it...
December 16, 2010 at 3:30 am
Can I just point out that the code is not SQL 2000 compatible, despite what it says at the top, because of the use of ROW_NUMBER()?
December 16, 2010 at 3:26 am
In point of fact you can use either the 32-bit or 64-bit version when you buy a SQL server license (so long as you don't use both at the same...
December 15, 2010 at 5:54 am
The reason your developers want you to do this is most likely because they have a service running on the other machine as Local System (or Network Service) and want...
December 14, 2010 at 1:26 am
Viewing 15 posts - 601 through 615 (of 832 total)