Viewing 15 posts - 496 through 510 (of 832 total)
Brandie Tarvin (6/16/2011)
Notice the difference in the accuracy.
They look the same to me--0.000, 0.003 or 0.007 means 3 divisions in 1/100th of a second, which is 1/300th second accuracy. Same...
June 17, 2011 at 7:53 am
Richard Warr (6/17/2011)please dont assume that questions are easy for everybody just because they fall into your particular sphere of experience.
It doesn't--I had to look it up as well. Comparing...
June 17, 2011 at 7:18 am
The more of these questions I see, the more I think there are a significant fraction of respondents who are just clicking an answer at random...surely this isn't difficult enough...
June 17, 2011 at 5:53 am
I disagree slightly with the premise. The ability to create a website or put an app out are both very specific programming skills which might not be relevant--for instance, most...
June 8, 2011 at 1:51 am
Jan Van der Eecken (6/1/2011)
Now if I would only remember how to re-write this in a proper language like X86 Assembler :w00t:
x86 a *proper* language? 68000 assembly all the way!!!...
June 2, 2011 at 1:10 am
Gianluca Sartori (5/31/2011)
Three years ago I had a Toyota yaris diesel. It could run 25 km with 1 litre.
That's about 70mpg (in UK measure, anyway) which is a lot better...
May 31, 2011 at 9:43 am
Jeff Moden (5/29/2011)
Now that's cool. Didn't know that. I may have to look into that... you're getting better gas mileage than my 1300 cc motorcycle.
I average 57mpg from...
May 31, 2011 at 2:35 am
gitmo (5/31/2011)
It's also easier to put invalid data in a denormalized database or one that lacks proper declarative referential integrity.
Entirely true, and I wasn't suggesting that we should all design...
May 31, 2011 at 1:59 am
Easy, yes, but apparently still hard enough for 50% of the respondents so far to have got it wrong! 🙂
May 31, 2011 at 1:36 am
Ironically, it's actually easier to make manual adjustments like this in a badly designed database--normalisation makes things easier for computers but a lot harder for people!
May 31, 2011 at 1:34 am
I'm pretty sure the 30% was a ballpark figure that one of the guys who wrote SQL server came up with--it wasn't ever intended to be a "you must use...
May 19, 2011 at 3:10 am
john.riley-1111039 (5/19/2011)
May 19, 2011 at 2:41 am
Mr Quillz (5/13/2011)
Something is wrong with that answer provided.
No, there isn't. Try reading the rest of the thread.
May 13, 2011 at 3:01 am
I second this post. The correct answer cannot be determined from the question as written.
Yes it can, because the question as written is talking about "data compression", NOT "backup...
May 6, 2011 at 6:14 am
Viewing 15 posts - 496 through 510 (of 832 total)