Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 8,251 through 8,265 (of 8,416 total)

  • RE: The T-SQL Paradigm

    steve dassin (4/20/2009)


    A ya and nay. A wash. I'll take it 🙂

    ...and everyone's happy. Cool.

  • RE: The T-SQL Paradigm

    I have edited out my rant because the transaction was rolled back, and therefore it never logically existed.

    Anyone who saw it must have been experiencing 'dirty reads'.

    😉

    Paul

  • RE: TSQL->C# SP

    RBarryYoung (4/19/2009)


    Heh, thanks.

    It's just occurred to me that there was a great opportunity back there for you to use a line like:

    "I find your lack of faith (in T-SQL) disturbing..."

    (c)...

  • RE: The T-SQL Paradigm

    Lynn Pettis (4/19/2009)


    And, as a final thought before I leave. As a professional, I must admit when I was wrong. Paul, I was wrong. Please except my...

  • RE: Are the posted questions getting worse?

    Florian Reischl (4/18/2009)


    What do you like more C# or VB.Net? It doesn't matter for me but I would like to write the functions good to read for the most people.

    Well...

  • RE: The T-SQL Paradigm

    Lynn Pettis (4/19/2009)


    NOW I SEE IT. Looks like I got the wrong QUOTE >

    ARRRRRGGGGG!!!!! I apologize, most profusely.

    50 lashes with a wet noodle!

    Now I'm confused :unsure:

    Perhaps I'll just go...

  • RE: TSQL->C# SP

    Barry,

    That's very clever - I hadn't thought of that. Points to you!

    Without being churlish though, I would argue that multi-process is very different from multi-thread:

    * Processes are heavy-weight and...

  • RE: The T-SQL Paradigm

    *** post deleted - PW ***

  • RE: The T-SQL Paradigm

    Jeff,

    I fixed those links at the same time - same problem.

    You might need to refresh the page.

    The links would have worked in CLR :w00t:

    Paul

  • RE: The T-SQL Paradigm

    Jeff Moden (4/19/2009)


    The link doesn't work, Paul.

    Thanks Jeff,

    Fixed now! Forgot the http:// prefix :blush:

    Cheers,

    Paul

  • RE: TSQL->C# SP

    RBarryYoung (4/19/2009)


    You can do this in T-SQL. Including the multi-threaded part.

    I'm not saying that it would be better, but ..., you CAN do it.

    Well Jeff's no fun anymore ;-)...

  • RE: Partitioning: I thought it would be faster...

    Hey Glenn,

    Criag Freedman has some excellent articles on this subject here

    I think you would enjoy reading it.

    BTW partitioning can increase performance in certain fairly narrow situations, but there are a...

  • RE: The T-SQL Paradigm

    steve dassin (4/19/2009)


    Res ipse loquitor

    *Ahem*

    Res ispa loquitur

    Just to be even-handed... 😀

    Paul

  • RE: The T-SQL Paradigm

    Lynn Pettis (4/19/2009)


    With the hyperbola and attacks on SQL Server

    I apologise profusely in advance, but:

    Hyperbola

    Hyperbole

    My only excuse is that my English teacher was very strict, and it's stuck with...

  • RE: Best Replaces for Cursor

    It's gone now.

    I didn't even try to understand it.

Viewing 15 posts - 8,251 through 8,265 (of 8,416 total)