Viewing 15 posts - 8,116 through 8,130 (of 8,416 total)
I don't normally ignore Gail's requests, but in this case, I could not resist:
http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/FindPost708104.aspx
Ensure your sarcasm detectors are buffered against overload before reading.
Paul
April 30, 2009 at 3:31 pm
john (4/30/2009)
Forgive me for the xpost. I only hit this and administration.
Oh well that's ok then! :doze:
At least you didn't cross-post above the allowable of maximum of...hey...where is that...
April 30, 2009 at 3:30 pm
Morning Flo!
It is a lovely sunny and crisp day in Wellington. The sunlight is sparkling off the sea in the harbour, and all is good with the world.
I hope...
April 30, 2009 at 3:22 pm
Here's another approach (using a large hammer):
DECLARE@sql VARCHAR(500);
SET@sql = 'ALTER DATABASE ' + DB_NAME() + ' SET RECOVERY BULK_LOGGED;'
EXECUTE(@sql)
IF@@error != 0 RETURN;
;WITHCTE (UserID, SeqNo, UserName, LastLoggedIn) AS
(
SELECTUserID,
ROW_NUMBER() OVER (PARTITION...
April 30, 2009 at 3:19 pm
Do you recall I said something about example code...? 😉
Paul
April 30, 2009 at 2:56 pm
Good point Flo!
April 30, 2009 at 2:54 pm
TheSQLGuru (4/30/2009)
...there is also the same issue of index scan/seek if you are using a function on a column in a where clause.
Unless you use the solution posted by Lynn...
April 30, 2009 at 2:53 pm
Amber.Brouillard (4/30/2009)
Nevermind, as I look at it closer, I see your point. Thanks for the correction.
Saints be praised 😉
April 30, 2009 at 2:48 pm
Wayne,
With an empty proc cache, isn't that what you would expect?
Once the proc in question has run once, you should see a cache hit instead of a cache miss with...
April 30, 2009 at 2:45 pm
We're testing some fusion drives at the moment.
April 30, 2009 at 2:42 pm
I am not aware of a way to do that directly, and judging by the lack of response, neither is anyone else.
If it disturbs you that much, consider starting jobs...
April 30, 2009 at 7:26 am
You should install the tools 'on top' of the existing installation and then re-install the service packs and cumulative updates to bring everything up to the latest available.
Paul
April 30, 2009 at 7:22 am
Your select will probably be taking Shared locks on the data as it reads it in. Shared locks are incompatible with the update and exclusive locks that the updates...
April 30, 2009 at 7:20 am
It is probably because the batch needs to be compiled and the data it needs might not be in memory. Once you have run it once, the chances are...
April 30, 2009 at 7:16 am
April 30, 2009 at 7:12 am
Viewing 15 posts - 8,116 through 8,130 (of 8,416 total)