Viewing 15 posts - 6,811 through 6,825 (of 8,415 total)
Kristy Lanter (10/27/2009)
October 27, 2009 at 3:25 pm
Kristy Lanter (10/27/2009)
How about Enterprise edition 64 bit?
Enterprise Edition has always had the ability to lock pages in memory.
October 27, 2009 at 2:53 pm
Yes I would think so too - I just haven't been able to make it behave the way we would expect yet.
It's currently sat in my interesting-but-useless pile. The...
October 26, 2009 at 5:12 pm
Good luck, and you're welcome of course.
edit: posting that, it's just occurred to me to ask you to check that your code doesn't switch context away from the target database...
October 26, 2009 at 8:23 am
I do agree with Mr Guru there about the ORDER BY thing, but as a matter of curiosity, I think the following also guarantees a repeatable order:
WITH TS AS (SELECT...
October 26, 2009 at 8:22 am
Interesting - and no, ALTER DATABASE is not allowed within a transaction.
Are you sure you're not just encountering an error of some kind between the SINGLE_USER and MULTI_USER changes?
An error...
October 26, 2009 at 7:58 am
Ok, but in which database is the stored procedure defined? AttendaDW? My guess would be not ;c)
The stored procedure needs to running in the context of the database...
October 26, 2009 at 7:27 am
Activity Monitor connections are a favourite.
If you need exclusive access to a database (for some reason...?) the traditional approach is to change context to that database (with the USE [database_name]...
October 26, 2009 at 4:23 am
Andrew Gothard-467944 (10/26/2009)
50 Characters? That's not a column name, that's an essay!
Apparently, in the next release, all data will be stored compressed in the column names - there won't...
October 26, 2009 at 3:51 am
ranjitrjha (10/22/2009)
Your explanation makes sense but when i am running
select top 10 * from table1
select top 10 * from table1
then for both queries, result set is same.
It's only when I...
October 26, 2009 at 1:31 am
I've come across what I believe to be both ends of the spectrum on this one.
First up, an old application built to be compatible with any back-end database (restrain yourself...
October 26, 2009 at 12:57 am
coboljobs2003 (10/20/2009)
(This webservice which is...
October 26, 2009 at 12:43 am
Alvin Ramard (10/21/2009)
Bob Hovious 24601 (10/21/2009)
Sigh... I always over-design things.
Before the XML data type, all data could be stored in tables with a no more than 4 columns. Now...
October 21, 2009 at 5:17 pm
Bob Hovious 24601 (10/21/2009)
Emperor Paulpatine,XML makes db design much simpler too:
create table XMLTable (ID bigint, Data xml)
...what's the ID column for? :laugh:
October 21, 2009 at 3:55 pm
WayneS (10/21/2009)
I really didn't see anything in the discussion that would make me feel between angry and depressed. Just my .02
Fair enough! It was the two guys saying...
October 21, 2009 at 6:58 am
Viewing 15 posts - 6,811 through 6,825 (of 8,415 total)