Viewing 15 posts - 781 through 795 (of 994 total)
Basically you're looking at using backups to archive old databases. There's nothing built-in to SQL Server that let's you do anything intelligent in terms of archiving - you need to...
January 29, 2008 at 10:48 pm
Well, its broken. When you do a revert there's nothing entered into the restorehistory table. The only way to tell that a database has been reverted is to look in...
January 29, 2008 at 8:12 pm
Looks like its squarely an issue with your IO subsystem. I'd get onto NetApp and have them help you diagnose the problem.
January 29, 2008 at 7:57 pm
The quality of support has gone way down - I used to constantly battle incorrect support engineers (a lot easier to do when you're running one of the dev teams...
January 29, 2008 at 4:34 pm
#1 - Absolutely not. Once a database is upgraded to the latest version, it can't be reverted to a down-level version
January 29, 2008 at 4:29 pm
Yes, you can upgrade directly from 2000 to 2008.
January 29, 2008 at 4:22 pm
Well, it depends 🙂
RAID 5 pays a penalty for writes so isn't suitable for OLTP systems, for instance. RAID 1 is fine unless you want high capacity or high speed...
January 29, 2008 at 6:58 am
I would move to Kimberly's favorite architecture of having a single table with current, read/write data - plus a partitioned table with older read-only data, with partitioned views over...
January 29, 2008 at 6:40 am
I am the source. I helped deprecate it when I ran the SQL Server Storage Engine dev team that wrote the new code for SQL Server 2005.
From Books Online in...
January 29, 2008 at 6:32 am
Cool.
By all means install SQL on the C drive, but don't fall into the trap of putting the data and log directories for any databases on the C drive too....
January 29, 2008 at 6:06 am
The only thing I can think of is that the SQL statement completes before the file system has really finished dropping the file - which shouldn't happen. Could be a...
January 29, 2008 at 1:44 am
I'll second what Joe says above. In the last few conference workshops I taught in November I was asked that question and did a poll of the attendees (1-200 in...
January 28, 2008 at 11:52 pm
If you're on the machine that has SQL Server on, and there's a default instance, try one of the following:
sqlcmd /E
for integrated security, or
sqlcmd /Uusername /Ppassword
for SQL Server security. If...
January 28, 2008 at 11:29 pm
It depends 🙂
What do you mean by 'faster'? Sure you may get a slightly faster response time if the app is on the same server as SQL Server instead of...
January 28, 2008 at 11:21 pm
One last thing on MS - it's a very big company, with lots of groups. Anyone can sponsor a whitepaper, write a blog post/MSDN article/technet article and publish it, or...
January 28, 2008 at 11:03 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 781 through 795 (of 994 total)