Viewing 15 posts - 1,681 through 1,695 (of 7,168 total)
I saw "clustered" and breezed right past "primary." Constraints have to be dropped and re-added, which brings FKs and NC indexes into it as well. Messy.
March 8, 2013 at 4:26 pm
Why BCHR doesn't normally matter: https://www.simple-talk.com/sql/database-administration/great-sql-server-debates-buffer-cache-hit-ratio/%5B/url%5D
As for PLE drops, you can trace for queries running when the PLE bottoms out to figure what is happening in the database when it...
March 8, 2013 at 3:13 pm
Like how to move them? Lookup CREATE INDEX, and specifically the DROP_EXISTING and ON [filegroup] options.
March 8, 2013 at 3:08 pm
In terms of being able to replicate data between two systems, nothing comes to mind. Why do you ask?
March 8, 2013 at 3:03 pm
Schemas do not own things, but I know what you mean.
In that case you can look into certificate signing or EXECUTE AS. I would go for certificate signing, it's a...
March 8, 2013 at 1:35 pm
But what is the XQuery '.' literal actually doing? Can I *assume* that since an empty string is sent to FOR XML PATH('') no root node name is created, and...
March 8, 2013 at 1:33 pm
SQL_Surfer (3/8/2013)
Inside the stored proc, it has insert statement...
March 8, 2013 at 12:48 pm
HowardW (3/8/2013)
hobt=Heap or B-Tree,
a.k.a. a "Hobbit" 😀
March 8, 2013 at 10:42 am
Your intuition was correct. You cannot declare variables inside parentheses where only a derived table should exist. You also cannot use WITH to begin a CTE inside parenethese where a...
March 8, 2013 at 10:34 am
Ha, I still do not know the backstory on that one but it sounds funny. Building on that, maybe DBCC MIDDLE_EARTH since it involves a hobt_id?
March 8, 2013 at 9:51 am
The "hangs infinitely" could be abother process blocking your proc. We can't know from the information presented. Have you looked at what else is running on the system when it...
March 8, 2013 at 9:49 am
kpwimberger (3/8/2013)
March 8, 2013 at 9:30 am
GilaMonster (3/8/2013)
opc.three (3/8/2013)
GilaMonster (3/3/2013)
They were added as separate columns to support a feature that was planned, partially added to SQL 2005 and later scrapped.
You know I am curious about these...
March 8, 2013 at 9:29 am
It looks like your code got truncated. It will not parse (missing END?) and also does not contain the original statement you were asking about beginning with SELECT * INTo...
March 8, 2013 at 8:17 am
Viewing 15 posts - 1,681 through 1,695 (of 7,168 total)