Viewing 15 posts - 241 through 255 (of 931 total)
Good question, never heard about this. Thanks.
October 27, 2011 at 9:58 pm
Using this option is better than detaching the database.
ALTER DATABASE <DBName> MODIFY FILE (NAME = '<logicalFile>', FILENAME = '<physicalname>')
With this we could avoid using sp_replicationdboption to remove...
October 27, 2011 at 7:46 am
beejug1983 (10/25/2011)
October 25, 2011 at 3:25 am
You could create a job on the target server and include the steps one by one as desired.
For copying the backup files, you could set up a shared drive and...
October 25, 2011 at 12:40 am
I think you won't be able to perform what you are trying. From books online, we have this information regarding
sp_replcmds. You could refer this link below.
"Replication treats the first...
October 25, 2011 at 12:35 am
Not tried this before but can you share the error message?
October 24, 2011 at 8:39 am
Useful article Kimberly, Thanks for sharing. Hopefully, we will get more articles from you on replication. 🙂
October 24, 2011 at 4:19 am
Eric Mamet (10/19/2011)
- failing some distribution cleanup on our test server (which we were never able to fix, although we think we installed replication exactly the same that...
October 20, 2011 at 8:45 am
Is that SQL2000 backup - a native backup file or taken using some third party tool?
October 20, 2011 at 2:32 am
vk-kirov (10/19/2011)
Resource Governor Concepts
October 20, 2011 at 12:44 am
If you don't mind me saying it seems that you have very little experience with Windows server systems and networks in general. Research TCP/IP and IP addressing. Practice these concepts...
October 19, 2011 at 12:42 am
Viewing 15 posts - 241 through 255 (of 931 total)