Viewing 15 posts - 121 through 135 (of 302 total)
I love articles like this. Great job, thank you!
October 10, 2011 at 8:25 am
I agree, sort of. In tests on SQL 2005, seems to me the proc call needs to be in TRY/CATCH else control does not flow down to the PRINT...
September 16, 2011 at 12:39 pm
Thanks, works great!
November 30, 2010 at 11:57 am
Maybe you meant this, which jibes with your earlier posts:
If you do not include this, then when the sproc is executed, it's executed with the rights of the user that...
November 1, 2010 at 1:46 pm
With all due respect, Steve, that just cannot be right. The vast majority of our procs were compiled with no "AS principal", and they are all run by users...
November 1, 2010 at 1:41 pm
The PS referenced text in earlier 7/1/2009 reply to the original post. That reply is why I
first posted here today, I keep having it quoted to me.
Since I can't...
November 1, 2010 at 1:08 pm
Thanks for the clarification, Steve. But I want to be sure.... When we don't specify this, and we usually don't, is the default "AS <owner>"?
I've almost...
November 1, 2010 at 11:11 am
I think the first part of sanderstad's reply is correct. But "So in other words it grants the user to give other users the same permission" is not, or...
November 1, 2010 at 10:48 am
We used certs because we did not want to have to worry about managing passwords in source code, or in config files, etc. By using certs, our development team...
October 26, 2010 at 12:05 pm
Now I'm confused. You're the one who originally posted this. Are you now able to resolve your problem w/out resorting to DBCC?
January 27, 2010 at 2:47 pm
Well spoken, good points. I appreciate your input. But I think you're assuming that the cause of the problem is a "bad plan" in the classical sense of that...
January 26, 2010 at 2:48 pm
I hear you guys, but it seems like you're making recommendations from an ivory tower. Are you speaking from experience with this precise problem? Or just general knowledge?...
January 26, 2010 at 1:01 pm
I have similar problem, posted in more detail at . We've tried a few different DBCCs like this, and were concerned about negative performance impact of clearing out cache....
January 26, 2010 at 12:14 pm
I have exactly same issue on a few different servers, all with completely different hardware/configuration/workloads. The only thing they have in common is SQL 2005 sp2 v3042 or sp2+...
January 26, 2010 at 12:11 pm
Agreed. We have write-cache enabled, similar situation, no problems.
November 20, 2009 at 5:45 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 121 through 135 (of 302 total)