Viewing 10 posts - 1 through 10 (of 10 total)
I have run into this same issue on both 7.0 and 2KEE. After a bit of research we discovered SQL Server was re-organizing its allocated memory so that it...
February 27, 2003 at 8:35 am
OK...silly question...Why is the database engine worring about how to display a value? This is a function that belongs to the presentation side of the house. I can...
February 22, 2003 at 12:51 pm
quote:
KSTEFAN - There is also 25% CPU activity and about 75% memory utilization. Any ideas ?
February 22, 2003 at 12:07 pm
quote:
Also I have been informed that SAN only works properly with ENTERPRISE Edition is this true??
February 22, 2003 at 11:50 am
quote:
If by chance you're using an IBM serveraid adapter you can go with raid 1E which is sorta like raid 10 in...
February 22, 2003 at 11:42 am
Wow...Those times are high. I moved a 38GB DB from one server to another in a little over three hours. One of the advantages I had was that...
February 22, 2003 at 11:12 am
I am using similar technology but on a smaller scale. We are running HP\Compaq’s (whatever) MSA1000. A couple of things that I watch very carefully are that the...
February 22, 2003 at 10:34 am
With only three drives (and one for hot swap) you have limited your options. If this machine is your sandbox then it's fine to create a single R5 array....
February 8, 2003 at 7:59 am
Hi Andy,
I will agree that from a logical perspective, all entities must have a primary key. I will also agree that in the transition to the physical realm, if...
August 8, 2002 at 8:44 am
We have a similar situation. We are pumping about 100K records a day into our table and we found that a few basic design concepts were invaluable.
First, we did...
August 8, 2002 at 6:51 am
Viewing 10 posts - 1 through 10 (of 10 total)