Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
hehe No I agree with that, they do enable many of us, but without criticism / faults there will be less improvement.
-Mark
September 25, 2008 at 12:27 am
Hi BitBucket,
Thanks for the reference, I'll have to read it 🙂 But why say DateTime2 and not BigDateTime? Anyway thanks again.
-Mark
September 24, 2008 at 3:37 pm
I didn't know about that one, thanks,
But,
1 weird name 🙂
2 this is SQL Server 2008
3 Still doesn't fix the current (in my eyes) wrong behavior
-Mark
September 24, 2008 at 2:18 pm
No I understand why this happens, I would just have expected the SQL Server team to make one exception to that rule when it affect the last possible value, or...
September 24, 2008 at 9:48 am
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)