Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
that explaines it indeed and it also shows why this workaround works. Or rather: It shows why this solution is even necessary to solve this issue.
thx!
December 15, 2011 at 6:40 am
I can live with this solution.
very very very very thank you very much, Brandie Tarvin
greetings Marc
December 15, 2011 at 6:21 am
Well it's the big solution I hoped for. but at least is seems to be a good workaround.
Now creating the next function with your alteration applied to it, I'm...
December 15, 2011 at 6:19 am
Thanks for your fast response.
If you leave out the convert function from the 'SET' line (Set @result = @ftest * 1.00000000), you'll get the same result too.
So, the...
December 15, 2011 at 6:05 am
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)