Viewing 15 posts - 76 through 90 (of 94 total)
Thanks Peter, I do appreciate the insight in the differences you provided on the use of stored procedures in Oracle vs SQLSever, however the real point of what I was after was...
maddog
February 21, 2006 at 8:44 am
Somebody call PETA, this poor kitty's has been skinned plenty!
maddog
February 10, 2006 at 11:04 am
Why not something as simple as:
---------------------------------------------------
DECLARE @col_mm_no smallint,
@col_yr_no smallint,
@dtDate datetime
SET @col_mm_no = 5
SET @col_yr_no = 2005
SET @dtDate = CAST(@col_mm_no AS CHAR) + '/1/' + CAST(@col_yr_no AS CHAR)
SELECT @dtDate
---------------------------------------------------
RETURNS:
2005-05-01 00:00:00.000
Which is in datetime format. Let the machine do...
maddog
February 10, 2006 at 6:56 am
Are you saying that all clients that access the ASP page from server 2 are exhibiting the same prompting before open behavior or that the prompt is occurring when you...
maddog
February 9, 2006 at 7:05 am
Thanks Gents for your responses. Ill take some time to see how the DateDiff approach might be used in my situation now that I think I know what's going on...
maddog
February 4, 2006 at 11:15 pm
I Haven't seen the DateDiff usage for grouping before, have typically used an approach like 'SELECT SUM(Amount) FROM Forecast WHERE DatePart(yy, acctperiod) BETWEEN @StartYear AND @EndYear' with the acctperiod column being a datetime. ...
maddog
February 2, 2006 at 11:05 pm
I like the numeric handling you proposed versus the char padding - didn't think of that trick. I can see that the BETWEEN operator will be used heavily as it...
maddog
February 1, 2006 at 1:05 pm
Thanks all for your replies.
I ran some statistics, albeit with limited data, on my own using execution plans to see what might the difference be between defining an accounting period...
maddog
February 1, 2006 at 10:33 am
Didn't finish my post before it magically fired off but you get the drift...anyway thanks for the reply.
I thought of the integer (February 2006 = 200602) approach but I was...
maddog
February 1, 2006 at 8:12 am
Didn't know I was presenting an argument...just stating that I've used a MUCK model under very strict circumstances for a very long time with no problems (honest). I agree the...
maddog
September 8, 2005 at 5:05 pm
...Change as in deletions from the list of values. If I feel this can be a possibility it is not a candidate for MUCK table. In more cases I will allow a...
maddog
September 8, 2005 at 4:23 pm
maddog
September 8, 2005 at 3:35 pm
(Hope this isn't a duplicate post as my first post seems to have bee sucked into a black hole...)
No argument that the use of separate tables is the quote 'best'...
maddog
September 8, 2005 at 12:41 pm
With all due respect to Mr. Celko, whose background I am familiar with and grasp of SQL internals is probably beyond compare, I felt your response was a little condescending and...
maddog
October 7, 2004 at 7:01 am
This is directed to Vince... I know this is a bit of time after this general thread was going on, but have been looking for a way to programmatically change...
maddog
August 25, 2004 at 12:04 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 76 through 90 (of 94 total)