Viewing 15 posts - 24,496 through 24,510 (of 26,490 total)
GSquared (7/3/2008)
Simon Facer (7/3/2008)
So, it still comes down to the right technology in the right circumstance, you just need to know the different behaviours...
July 3, 2008 at 12:03 pm
aayub (7/3/2008)
Sr1Col1 Col2Col3
1BU123456 80440
2BU123456 0KPMGF1
3BU123456 8044KPMGF1
4FC123456 80440
5FC123456 0KPMGF1
6FC123456 8044KPMGF1
7BU123456 00
8FC123456 00
Need help with an optimized query for.
The following conditions:
If we have an exact...
July 3, 2008 at 11:02 am
GilaMonster (7/3/2008)
Truth is, I just don't like being wrong.
Truth be told, none of us do. The difference is between those who can admit it and those who can't.
Those who...
July 3, 2008 at 10:57 am
Okay, thanks. Unfortunately (?) we are looking at consolidating some of our servers, and will be using named instances where a separation is required.
😎
July 3, 2008 at 10:52 am
Where the columns in the select list come into index selection relates to covered indexes. For example, you have an index on an Employee table using EmpID, EmpLastName, EmpFirstName....
July 3, 2008 at 10:43 am
Carl Federl (7/3/2008)
For each application, use DNS to alias the server name. Then when a database needs to be moved for performance reasons or the...
July 3, 2008 at 10:30 am
Jeff Moden (7/3/2008)
Jeff Moden (7/3/2008)
Ted Pin (7/3/2008)
Oops, I meant "Would a prolific contributor like to write [a guide to writing articles] for [the SQLServerCentral.com community]?"
Nah... I'd get it wrong... I...
July 3, 2008 at 10:11 am
The purpose of doing looped Deletes is usually two fold...
1. Do the deletes and still allow the table to be used.
2. Keep the transaction log small.
Item #2 above...
July 3, 2008 at 8:52 am
I can see using table variables in test environments to test insert/update/delete processes in a explicit transaction. In SQL Server 2005 this is easier using the OUTPUT clause to...
July 3, 2008 at 8:24 am
Ron Kunce (7/3/2008)
jim.powers (7/3/2008)
http://www.microsoft.com/sql/prodinfo/features/compare-features.mspx
In the Workgroup column on the row for RAM, the limit...
July 3, 2008 at 8:14 am
Steve Hindle (7/3/2008)
I have also been experimenting...
I created:
Full1.Bak
Tran1.TRN
Full2.BAK
Tran2.TRN
using SQL2005. I deleted Full2.BAK and restored Full1.Bak, Tran1.TRN and then Tran2.TRN and this worked.
I'm still a tad...
July 3, 2008 at 8:03 am
I'll ask a more general question first. What is being deleted, and what are the requirements for the solution you are working on? I ask, as another way...
July 1, 2008 at 11:58 am
Andrew Hall (7/1/2008)
July 1, 2008 at 7:12 am
Viewing 15 posts - 24,496 through 24,510 (of 26,490 total)