Viewing 15 posts - 16,441 through 16,455 (of 26,486 total)
Stefan_G (3/22/2010)
Paul White NZ (3/21/2010)
March 22, 2010 at 11:47 am
Here is another option:
declare @JDate int;
set @JDate = 2010032;
select dateadd(dd, ((@JDate % 1000) - 1), DATEADD(yy, ((@JDate / 1000) - 1900), CAST('1900-01-01' as datetime)))
March 22, 2010 at 11:40 am
amandix (3/22/2010)
The question is: is it possible to do it in SQL 2008, like it was in...
March 22, 2010 at 11:06 am
To use xp_cmdshell in SQL Server 2005 you have to enable it using the Surface Area Configuration program as it is disabled by default.
Check Books Online for additional information.
March 21, 2010 at 12:25 am
First, you should not use the SET ROWCOUNT to limit the number of rows processed in SQL Server 2005/2008. This has been marked for depreciation in future versions of...
March 20, 2010 at 10:40 pm
There will be one small issue you may need to verify, any logins whose default database is MyDB (the one you are moving via detach/attach) will probably need fixing after...
March 20, 2010 at 10:30 pm
wbeaton-664441 (3/18/2010)
"Reducing the physical size of a log file requires shrinking the file."
You can truncate a transaction...
March 20, 2010 at 8:29 pm
Natalie C (3/20/2010)
Lynn Pettis (3/20/2010)
Paul White NZ (3/19/2010)
Lynn Pettis (3/19/2010)
March 20, 2010 at 8:24 pm
Paul White NZ (3/20/2010)
Lynn Pettis (3/20/2010)
March 20, 2010 at 1:54 pm
Paul White NZ (3/20/2010)
Lynn Pettis (3/20/2010)
March 20, 2010 at 1:12 pm
Interesting idea. I think it would be good idea and perhaps implemented by extending the RESTORE statement, perhaps RETAIN_OLDDB with maybe a couple of options to it.
Curious what others...
March 20, 2010 at 12:35 pm
To accomplish what you are attempting, you will actually need to use dynamic sql. The code as written is failing when it is being parsed, not when it is...
March 20, 2010 at 12:30 pm
Thinking about it, it may have been done inside a WHERE clause, not the ON portion of JOIN clause. Just not enough time to go searching through the forum...
March 20, 2010 at 12:18 pm
Lynn Pettis (3/20/2010)
Paul White NZ (3/20/2010)
The boolean logic expression is correct, but the code isn't...!
Usually we use this trick to transform ORs...
March 20, 2010 at 12:12 pm
Paul White NZ (3/20/2010)
The boolean logic expression is correct, but the code isn't...!
Usually we use this trick to transform ORs into ANDs,...
March 20, 2010 at 11:19 am
Viewing 15 posts - 16,441 through 16,455 (of 26,486 total)