Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 61 total)
Short question ![]()
There is no default order of rows without an Order By clause. You may get the rows always sorted the same way,...
May 21, 2006 at 8:29 am
You "hear" to many things. Read the BOL instead, it's a free download.
Partitioned views and table partionning are 2 different beasts. Of course it knows where to store/get the data....
May 19, 2006 at 4:04 pm
Your "heard" half right. SQL2k AND SQL2k5 both support hash joins (among others). Everybody use them, although most people don't know it ![]()
The query...
May 19, 2006 at 3:57 pm
It depends. ETL is much faster and can handle much more complex logic. DTS (now renamed SSIS I think) are specialized for it.
ELT is a good choice when the amonount of...
May 19, 2006 at 12:05 pm
With SQL2K there is the unsupported xp_execresultset that was handy. With SQL2k5, you may have to rewrite it in C# I think.
Example (doing an insert but you get the point):
May 19, 2006 at 8:16 am
Noeld,
If you read the entire thread, you will notice that:
May 17, 2006 at 5:42 am
Datetime is an imprecise datatype. You always have +-3ms.
Try this:
Select cast('2006-05-15 23:59:59.999' as
May 15, 2006 at 12:15 pm
Here it goes:
/*
For performance reasons, I am using a RECVER (record version) column instead of the update timestamp.
That column exists to support optimistic concurrency across n database vendors
It...
May 13, 2006 at 4:06 pm
Ryan,
In did not forget the example. While coding it I discovered a flaw in my logic (I can end up with a data anomaly with the "first" row, i.e. the...
May 13, 2006 at 4:33 am
Sorry about the lack of examples Ryan. I posted the table structure but I had so many alternatives I had tried it would have been confusing. Some of them worked...
May 11, 2006 at 12:33 pm
Thanks for replying. I am doing a delta instead of a full copy because copying the full row would kill the server. We get thousands of tran per minutes. Some...
May 11, 2006 at 11:36 am
I got it right by guessing, since the choice of words was misleading. The OVER clause is a CLAUSE, not a FUNCTION. And the DENSE_RANK* answer was almost right by...
April 26, 2006 at 6:12 am
No effect on execution time. No effect on compilation time either but I suppose you should have some effect on parse time. It is also consuming some additional amounts of...
April 24, 2006 at 6:07 am
Please do not cross post to multiple forums.
You can store anything in SQL (anything that can be expressed digitally I mean
) ....
March 30, 2006 at 6:07 am
The question doesn't make much sense. Please provide some DDL if you want help. A "row" width is not calculated is number of characters, so I suppose you are refering...
March 5, 2006 at 2:10 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 61 total)