Viewing 15 posts - 91 through 105 (of 617 total)
Roland Alexander STL (11/15/2012)
Hugo Kornelis (11/15/2012)
Roland Alexander STL (11/15/2012)
November 15, 2012 at 8:09 am
Fortunately there is a fair amount of crossover knowledge and experience between SQL development and administration. How much cross over depends on a combination of factors. The job:...
November 14, 2012 at 6:01 am
Personally I like Joes 2 Pros[/url]. Their books are for the development path rather than the administrative one but still quite good.
November 12, 2012 at 9:42 am
adam_pearson (11/5/2012)
Thanks for the example however no joy with that either. Using either a table as the source or hard coding it into the FOREACH container...
November 5, 2012 at 10:27 am
The new machine is their desktop, not the server. The databases should all be the same as they have been.
November 2, 2012 at 2:07 pm
You could try running DBCC CHECKTABLE and see if it shows anything. Or try looking at sys.dm_db_index_physical_stats and see if it needs to be rebuilt anyway based on fragmentation.
November 1, 2012 at 1:36 pm
Here is an example using backupset. If I understood what you were asking for this should be it. It outputs the data as datatype TIME. If you...
November 1, 2012 at 12:39 pm
Are there any indexes on the table? If so you might consider rebuilding them. I've seen "corrupted" before, causing similar problems.
November 1, 2012 at 12:28 pm
I would check and make sure your secondary package has a package configuration set up. It would need to be type "Parent Variable" and you can use it to...
October 31, 2012 at 1:46 pm
Actually I found that if you have OPTIMIZE FOR ADHOC on and see a full adhoc plan rather than a stub then it is actually the second time the query...
October 31, 2012 at 10:32 am
You were right. I checked again and everything was fine. I'll remember the checkpoint for next time though.
Thanks!
October 30, 2012 at 12:07 pm
Awsome question! Learned something new and that always brightens my day!
October 29, 2012 at 10:57 am
Very true and I would certainly recommend the same. In this particular case it is a lookup table but not a parent to any other table. It's being...
October 25, 2012 at 6:21 am
Excellent point. I definitely should have made it clustered if I was going to put any type of index on it. I'm not really sure how much it...
October 24, 2012 at 3:27 pm
Actually it's the combination of the columns that are unique. I have used filtered indexes before (and think they are a great addition to SQL Server). In this...
October 24, 2012 at 9:52 am
Viewing 15 posts - 91 through 105 (of 617 total)