Viewing 15 posts - 14,896 through 14,910 (of 59,097 total)
Further, using scalar functions to select from a table is going to cause a performance problem. The function code needs to be converted to an iTVF.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 20, 2017 at 12:29 pm
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 19, 2017 at 2:40 pm
Crud... "Random Masking". It thought it was an early question about Halloween. 😉
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 19, 2017 at 2:11 pm
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 19, 2017 at 2:09 pm
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 18, 2017 at 2:32 pm
All "Costs" are really just estimates. The real key here is... is there actually a performance problem? How long does the query typical take to execute, how many CPU milliseconds...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 18, 2017 at 2:30 pm
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 17, 2017 at 9:30 pm
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 14, 2017 at 6:52 am
Sergiy - Thursday, June 8, 2017 1:15 AMIn real life there is no threshold for execution duration.
True enough but, in real...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 12, 2017 at 7:16 pm
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 12, 2017 at 5:53 pm
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 12, 2017 at 5:49 pm
Based on the fact that someone used the YEAR() function in one of the renditions of the code, can we safely assume that the t.tabdate column is a DATETIME column? ...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 12, 2017 at 12:24 pm
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 12, 2017 at 8:02 am
If it were an NCHAR, you would need to be seriously concerned no matter what. I ran into this problem before with some system tables (can't remember which ones just...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 10, 2017 at 8:23 pm
Here's the link for the current definition of PARSENAME.
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/sql/t-sql/functions/parsename-transact-sql
But Books Online and the link above is incorrect. PARSENAME actually returns an NVARCHAR(128), which is the...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 10, 2017 at 6:23 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 14,896 through 14,910 (of 59,097 total)